$60,000 in back taxes, a signature, and a house sold within a month

2025 United States Sentenced

Joseph Goodnough, 42, of Rensselaer County, New York, was sentenced in October 2025 after deceiving an elderly Schoharie County homeowner — who had fallen more than $60,000 behind on his property taxes — into signing a deed transfer during a confusing paper-shuffling signing, on a promise to manage the taxes and eventually buy the home himself. Goodnough instead sold the property for $142,500 within a month, pocketing more than $75,000, while the original owner kept living in the house until the new buyers discovered him there.

Year
2025
Where
United States
Outcome
Sentenced
Reported loss
$142,500
Victims
2
Schemes
Home title fraud
Last reviewed
2026-09-11

The facts, as recorded

Why this case matters

Every other case on this page involves a deed forged without the true owner ever signing anything. This one shows the other route into the same crime: a real signature, obtained through deception about what was actually being signed — during, in the DA’s own description, a “shuffling” of paperwork. The legal effect on the property record is the same either way.

Speed as the whole strategy

Less than a month passed between the deed transfer and the resale. That gap is the entire plan: get the property back onto the market and into a new buyer’s hands before the original owner realises what the paperwork he signed actually did, or before anyone else notices the deed at the county clerk’s office.

Two victims, not one

The buyer who paid $142,500 is as much a victim as the original homeowner — they paid market rate for a title that turned out to be worthless the moment the fraud surfaced, which is why the court ordered restitution to both.

The caveat

Goodnough has been sentenced; this is a concluded criminal case. Restitution was, as of this page’s last review, still being paid on a schedule rather than paid in full.

Sources

  1. Man sentenced for deed theft scheme that defrauded elderly homeowner. CBS6 Albany (WRGB). Accessed 2026-09-11. Supports: Goodnough's name, age and location, the charge, the elderly victim and his $60,000+ in back taxes, the deceptive signing, the $142,500 resale and $75,000+ profit within a month, the utility shut-off and removal attempt, the sentence, the restitution to two victims, and the Carney quote.

If a legal outcome in this case has changed, please tell us and the page will be corrected. See the corrections policy.