Government impersonation

Also called: IRS scam · CRA scam · HMRC scam · ATO scam · Social Security scam · police impersonation · authority scam

Government impersonation is a scam in which a caller poses as a tax authority, police force, social security agency or border service and claims you owe money, are under investigation, or must move your funds to keep them safe. Reported US losses nearly doubled in a year, to $798 million in 2025. No agency demands payment by phone or collects cash from your home.

Key facts

Category
Impersonation
First documented
2013
Typical loss
$1k–$400k USD, per victim
Main channels
phone call, SMS, email, letter, WhatsApp, video call, robocall
Who is targeted
People over 60, who report the largest losses in this category; Recent immigrants and visa holders, whose status makes an official threat far more frightening; Non-native speakers approached in their first language; Anyone with an unresolved worry about tax, benefits or immigration; Students and temporary residents, targeted with deportation threats
Documented origins
India, United States, Dominican Republic, Pakistan, Nigeria
Main targets
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, India, Singapore, Ireland, New Zealand
Case files
23 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-09-06
Anatomy of a government impersonation scamAnatomy of a government impersonation scam. Fear alone makes people hang up. Fear plus an offered way out keeps them on the line. 1. A call from the right number: Caller ID shows the agency's real published number. Spoofing it costs nothing. 2. A specific, plausible problem: Unfiled tax, a warrant, an ID number used in a crime, a parcel stopped at customs. 3. Your own details, quoted back: An address, part of an ID number. Bought from breach data, offered as proof. 4. Stakes raised, then a door opened: Arrest today — but this can be resolved now, quietly, if you cooperate. 5. Isolation, made explicit: Stay on the line. Tell no one. Bank staff may be part of the investigation. 6. Move your money to safety: A protected federal account, or gold, or crypto, held until the case closes. 7. Collected, not transferred: A courier takes cash or gold at the door — a rail no bank fraud system can see. 8. Worked again: A number that engaged once is called again, or a recovery offer arrives weeks later. The diagram marks stage 6 as the point where the scheme can still be stopped: No government agency anywhere asks you to move, withdraw or convert your money to keep it safe. There is no protective government account. This single instruction identifies the call as fraudulent however convincing everything before it was, and it is the point at which losses go from hundreds to hundreds of thousands.Anatomy of a government impersonation scamFear alone makes people hang up. Fear plus an offered way out keeps them on the line.1A call from the rightnumberCaller ID shows theagency's real publishednumber. Spoofing it costsnothing.Minutes2A specific, plausibleproblemUnfiled tax, a warrant, anID number used in a crime,a parcel stopped atcustoms.Minutes3Your own details,quoted backAn address, part of an IDnumber. Bought from breachdata, offered as proof.Minutes4Stakes raised, then adoor openedArrest today — but this canbe resolved now, quietly,if you cooperate.Minutes5Isolation, madeexplicitStay on the line. Tell noone. Bank staff may be partof the investigation.Hours6Move your money tosafetyA protected federalaccount, or gold, orcrypto, held until the casecloses.Hours7Collected, nottransferredA courier takes cash orgold at the door — a railno bank fraud system cansee.Same day8Worked againA number that engaged onceis called again, or arecovery offer arrivesweeks later.WeeksWhere it can still be stopped — stage 6No government agency anywhere asks you to move, withdraw or convert your money to keep it safe. There is no protective government account. This singleinstruction identifies the call as fraudulent however convincing everything before it was, and it is the point at which losses go from hundreds to hundreds ofthousands.Stages documented in US Department of Justice prosecutions of May 2025 and the FBI's 2025 Internet Crime Report.howscamswork.com
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.

What it is

Government impersonation is the oldest lever in fraud pointed at the most reliable target: your willingness to comply with authority.

Someone calls claiming to be from the tax office, the police, the social security administration, the border service or a court. There is a problem — unpaid tax, a warrant, a compromised social security number, a package intercepted at customs, an investigation with your name on it. It is serious, it is happening now, and there is a way to resolve it that involves paying or moving money immediately.

What makes it work is not that people are credulous about government. It is that being contacted by a government agency about a problem is a normal thing that genuinely happens, and most people do not know the procedural details well enough to notice that this version is wrong.

The category is growing faster than almost anything else. IC3 recorded 32,424 complaints and $798 million in losses in 2025, against $405.6 million in 2024 — losses nearly doubling in a year. The FTC logged 265,975 government imposter reports in 2024, up from 197,496 two years earlier.

How it actually works

  1. The call, with the right number on the display

    Caller ID shows the agency’s genuine published number, because spoofing it is trivial. Some operations open with a robocall or a text and wait for the callback, which puts the victim in the position of having initiated contact.

  2. A specific, plausible problem

    Unfiled tax. A warrant. A social security number used in a crime. A parcel with your name on it stopped at the border. Details are sprinkled in — an address, part of an ID number — bought from breach data, and offered as proof of legitimacy.

  3. Your own details, quoted back at you

    An address. Part of an identification number. An employer, a recent purchase, a family member’s name. All of it is buyable from breach data and from lists sold between fraud operations, and all of it is offered as proof that the caller is who they say. A real agency already holds your details and has no reason to recite them to you.

  4. The stakes are raised, then a door is opened

    Arrest today, benefits stopped, deportation, assets frozen. Then, crucially, a way out: this can be resolved now, quietly, if you cooperate. Fear alone makes people call someone else; fear plus a solution makes them comply.

  5. You are kept on the line

    Do not hang up. Do not talk to anyone. Do not tell the bank — staff may be part of it. The call can run for hours, and in the “digital arrest” variant it runs for days on video.

  6. The instruction to move money

    Pay the fine. Or, more damaging: move your savings to a “safe” or “protected” federal account while the investigation runs. Or convert it to gold, or cryptocurrency, for safekeeping.

    Where it could have stopped

    No government agency anywhere asks you to move, withdraw or convert your money to keep it safe. There is no protective government account. That single instruction identifies the call as fraudulent no matter how convincing everything before it was — and it is the point at which losses go from hundreds to hundreds of thousands.

  7. Collection on a rail with no reversal

    Cryptocurrency at an ATM, gift card codes read aloud, a wire transfer, or gold and cash handed to a courier at the victim’s door.

  8. Repetition

    Numbers that engaged once are worked again — sometimes by the same operation with a new pretext, sometimes by a recovery scam weeks later.

Why it works

Compliance with authority is normally correct. People who pay their tax, answer letters and cooperate with the police are behaving sensibly. The scam does not have to overcome scepticism; it rides on a habit that serves people well the rest of the time.

Nobody knows the procedure. Most people could not say how their tax authority would actually contact them about an underpayment, or what a real arrest warrant looks like. That gap is where the whole scheme lives — and it is why the countermeasures on this page are procedural facts rather than instructions to be sceptical.

The details feel like proof. An address, the last digits of an ID number, an employer’s name. All of it is buyable. Real agencies already hold your information and have no reason to recite it.

Fear plus a way out produces compliance rather than escape. Pure intimidation makes people hang up and call someone. Intimidation with an offered resolution keeps them on the line, cooperating, feeling that they are handling it responsibly.

Isolation is imposed explicitly. Stay on the line. Do not discuss it. Bank staff may be involved. The instruction is the scheme defending itself against the person most likely to stop it — a teller asking what the withdrawal is for.

And vulnerability is targeted deliberately. Australia’s National Anti-Scam Centre found that people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities made up 7% of those reporting threat-based scams but 52.7% of the losses, driven substantially by operations impersonating overseas law enforcement and threatening imprisonment or deportation. Threat-based scams were also the highest-loss category for Australians aged 18 to 24 — young migrants and international students, not the pensioners the stereotype expects.

Where it comes from

Two well-documented production centres appear repeatedly in the enforcement record, and both are described here as criminal operations rather than as anything about the countries they sit in.

India-based call centres account for a large share of the North American volume. The Justice Department has run repeated joint actions with Indian authorities, and the Delaware case documented below involved an Indian national and at least $2.1 million in losses from victims told they were under federal investigation. These are organised operations with scripts, shifts and supervisors.

Call centres in the Dominican Republic feature heavily in the family-emergency and bail variants aimed at the United States, with couriers based in US cities to collect.

There is also a domestic layer everywhere — the couriers, the mule accounts, the gold buyers — and it is where prosecutions usually start, because it is the only part of the operation standing inside the jurisdiction.

The most significant recent change is technical. The FBI has warned about senior US officials being impersonated in messaging campaigns, and AI voice cloning has made a convincing impersonation cheap. The practical consequence is that “they sounded official” has stopped being evidence.

Real cases

Scammers impersonating the FBI's own fraud-reporting centre

2026 US Ongoing

In July 2026 the FBI updated a warning first issued in April 2025 about an ongoing scheme in which criminals impersonate FBI personnel and the Internet Crime Complaint Center itself in order to re-victimise people who have already been scammed. The scheme uses AI-generated video, spoofed websites that harvest personal data, and fake FBI profiles on social media, and it is triggered precisely when a victim announces they intend to report the fraud.

Read the case file · 1 source

A pandemic relief programme, invoked six years later

2026 US Charged — allegation, not conviction

In June 2026 a federal court in California halted an operation trading as National Amendment Assistance, which the FTC alleges falsely represented that its mortgage relief services were connected to the CARES Act's homeowner assistance programmes and took unlawful upfront fees. Some homeowners fell behind on their mortgages and faced foreclosure. The allegations are unproven.

Read the case file · 2 sources

USCIS lists fifteen scams, and says what it will never do

2026 US Ongoing

USCIS maintains a standing catalogue of immigration scams — impersonators, fake websites, visa lottery fraud, job offers, "jumping the line" schemes — and pairs it with a short list of things the agency will never do. The most useful item is the payment rule: USCIS will never ask you to transfer money to an individual, and does not accept Western Union, MoneyGram, PayPal, Venmo or gift cards.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Fewer victims, four times the loss: Canada's bank investigator scam

2025 CA Ongoing $13.4m

The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre files the safe-account scam under "Bank Investigator", and its open dataset shows two lines moving in opposite directions. Reports fell from 2,311 in 2021 to 1,771 in the first nine months of 2025, while reported losses rose from C$4.7 million to C$18.7 million over the same period. Fewer people are being caught, and each one is losing roughly four times as much.

Read the case file · 1 source

Bail money at the door: a courier for Dominican Republic call centres

2025 US · DO Charged — allegation, not conviction

In May 2025 a grand jury in the District of New Jersey indicted Jhonny Cepeda of New York with wire fraud conspiracy. Prosecutors allege he worked as a courier in a "grandparent" or "family-in-need-of-bail" scam run from call centres in the Dominican Republic, which deceived numerous elderly Americans into believing a loved one had been arrested and urgently needed cash for bail and legal fees.

Read the case file · 1 source

37,342 crypto kiosks, and a third of one state's operators unregistered

2025 US Ongoing $246.7m

FinCEN's notice of 4 August 2025 records 10,956 IC3 complaints involving crypto kiosks in 2024 with about $246.7 million lost — complaints up 99% in a year. It also records the machines growing from 4,128 to 37,342 in six years, a third of one state's operators failing to register, and scammers steering victims to specific kiosks to avoid the compliant ones.

Read the case file · 2 sources

$2.95bn lost to impersonation, and a rule with a $53,088 price tag

2025 US Ongoing $3.0bn

The FTC's Impersonation Rule took effect in April 2024 and makes it illegal to falsely pose as a business or a government body, or to misrepresent an endorsement, with civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation. In its first-year review the FTC recorded $2.95 billion in impersonation losses in 2024 and warned that AI-generated deepfakes threaten to turbocharge the problem.

Read the case file · 3 sources

"Real Medicare cards are free and mailed to you automatically"

2025 US Ongoing

The FTC publishes a Medicare Open Enrollment warning every autumn, and the 30 September 2025 edition contains the single most useful sentence in the whole category: real Medicare cards are free and mailed automatically. Anybody who calls offering a new or updated one, and asks for a number to process it, has identified themselves.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Older adults losing six figures to impersonation scams rose eightfold

2025 US Ongoing $445.0m

The FTC reported in August 2025 that combined losses from older adults who lost more than $100,000 to impersonation scams rose eightfold, from $55 million in 2020 to $445 million in 2024. The payment instructions in those cases are physical: cash into Bitcoin ATMs, and stacks of cash or gold handed to couriers.

Read the case file · 3 sources

"Real utilities won't demand payment to avoid same-day disconnection"

2025 US Ongoing

The FTC's standing guidance on utility impersonation contains the one fact that resolves the whole scheme: a real utility company does not demand immediate payment to prevent a same-day shut-off. Everything else in the call — the account number, the local caller ID, the truck supposedly on its way — is decoration around a deadline that does not exist.

Read the case file · 3 sources

One million Americans' Medicare numbers, and a $10.6bn catheter claim

2025 US Charged — allegation, not conviction $14.6bn

The Justice Department's June 2025 health care fraud takedown charged 324 defendants over more than $14.6 billion in alleged fraud — the largest in its history. Two of its cases matter to consumers rather than to insurers: identity theft affecting more than a million Americans across all fifty states, and a $703 million scheme in which AI was allegedly used to fake beneficiaries' recorded consent. All of it is allegation.

Read the case file · 3 sources

83,668 WhatsApp accounts blocked, and still no case count

2025 IN Ongoing

Across three parliamentary answers between December 2024 and December 2025, the Indian government reported blocking Skype IDs, WhatsApp accounts, SIM cards and handsets used for digital arrest at a steadily rising rate — from 1,700 Skype IDs to 3,962, and 59,000 WhatsApp accounts to 83,668. In the same answers it repeats that no separate count of digital arrest cases exists.

Read the case file · 4 sources

Reported cyber fraud losses in India rose tenfold in two years

2025 IN Ongoing $2.7bn

A parliamentary answer of 2 December 2025 records cyber fraud losses reported in India rising from ₹2,290 crore in 2022 to ₹22,846 crore in 2024 — a tenfold increase in two years — while complaints on the national portal went from 10.29 lakh to 22.68 lakh. The reporting system was also expanding over the same period, which is part of the rise and cannot be separated from it.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Pop-ups, live agents and 300 victims across 37 states

2025 US · CA Charged — allegation, not conviction $5.0m

In May 2025 the US Attorney's Office for the District of Rhode Island indicted eight people over a transnational fraud and money laundering scheme aimed at elderly people in the United States and Canada. Pop-up messages on victims' computers made false claims that lured them into calling live agents, who then told them their financial assets were at risk or could be garnished. Investigators identified around 300 victims in at least 37 states with known losses exceeding million.

Read the case file · 1 source

Japan's "fake police" fraud took 69% of all special-fraud losses

2025 JP Ongoing $556.0m

Japan's National Police Agency began counting ニセ警察詐欺 — police impersonation fraud — as a separate category in January 2025. By the end of November it accounted for 9,642 cases and ¥83.19 billion: 38.7% of all special fraud cases and 68.6% of all the money. Ninety-nine per cent of it started with a telephone call.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Crypto handovers in Japanese fraud rose 1,446% in a year

2025 JP Ongoing $399.2m

Japan's special fraud reached 13,213 cases and ¥59.73 billion in the first half of 2025, up 47.5% and 162.1%. Underneath the totals the delivery channel is moving: bank transfers now carry 62.2% of cases, cryptocurrency handovers rose 1,445.8%, and 79.1% of all approaches still start with a telephone call.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Posing as federal agents: $2.1 million from people told they were under investigation

2025 US · IN Convicted $2.1m

In May 2025 the US Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware announced that Rakeshkumar Patel, an Indian national, had pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy over an elder fraud scheme targeting Americans. Victims were called by fraudsters posing as federal agents who convinced them their identities had been stolen and that they were themselves under federal investigation. The scheme involved at least .1 million in losses.

Read the case file · 1 source

Project Red Hook: gift cards as a laundering rail

2025 US · CN Ongoing

Homeland Security Investigations runs a dedicated initiative against Chinese organised crime groups exploiting gift cards. Its account is the clearest available: three techniques — tampering cards on shelves, attacking accounts online, and laundering codes bought by scam victims — combining organised retail crime, victim-assisted fraud and trade-based money laundering.

Read the case file · 2 sources

Gold couriers: collecting precious metals from the door

2025 US Charged — allegation, not conviction $311.8m

In May 2025 a grand jury in the Northern District of Florida charged Atharva "Andy" Sathawane with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering over a scheme that defrauded elderly victims across the United States into handing over money and gold in response to fraudulent phone calls and messages. The FBI recorded roughly 725 complaints and .8 million in losses to gold-courier schemes in 2025 — an average loss per complaint of over ,000.

Read the case file · 2 sources

Losses at Bitcoin ATMs rose nearly tenfold in three years

2024 US Ongoing $110.0m

The FTC's September 2024 analysis found reported losses at Bitcoin ATMs rising nearly tenfold from 2020 to over $110 million in 2023, and topping $65 million in the first half of 2024 alone. The median loss was $10,000, people over 60 were three times as likely to lose money at one, and the losses come overwhelmingly from impersonation scams.

Read the case file · 2 sources

Three federal agencies issued one warning as a hurricane approached

2024 US Ongoing

On 9 October 2024, with hurricanes making landfall, the FTC, the Justice Department and the CFPB issued a joint warning about disaster scams and price gouging. It names four categories — fake charities, government impersonators, bogus recovery businesses and price gouging — and its framing is unusual: the message is addressed to companies as much as to consumers.

Read the case file · 2 sources

$212m on gift cards, and the reason that number is small

2024 US Ongoing $212.0m

US consumers reported losing $212 million on gift or reload cards across 41,120 reports in 2024 — the sixth-largest payment method by losses, well behind bank transfers at $2.09 billion. The gap is the point: gift cards are used for the scams that take hundreds, and they are the method most likely to go unreported entirely.

Read the case file · 2 sources

India's government describes the fake police station on the screen

2024 IN Ongoing

On 14 May 2024 India's Ministry of Home Affairs published an alert describing a scheme it calls "digital arrest": callers posing as police, CBI, the narcotics department, the RBI or the Enforcement Directorate, holding victims on video for as long as it takes. The detail that makes the alert unusual is the set — the government records fraudsters using studios modelled on police stations, in uniform.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Red flags

  • An unexpected call, text or email claiming to be a government agency. First contact about a real problem is a letter, everywhere.
  • A threat of immediate arrest, deportation, or frozen assets delivered by phone. Real enforcement does not work by warning you on a call.
  • Payment demanded in gift cards, cryptocurrency, wire transfer or cash. No agency on earth accepts these.
  • An instruction to move money to a “safe”, “protected” or “federal” account. There is no such account.
  • An instruction to convert savings to gold or cryptocurrency for safekeeping.
  • Anyone coming to your home to collect cash, gold or documents. No agency does this.
  • Being told to stay on the line, not to hang up, or not to discuss it with anyone.
  • Being told bank staff may be involved in the investigation, or that you must not say what a withdrawal is for.
  • Recitation of your own details as proof. Breach data is cheap. Real agencies do not need to prove themselves to you.
  • A number in the message to call back on. Look the agency up yourself, every time.
  • A caller who transfers you to a “supervisor” or a second agency to add weight.

If it’s happening to you

On a call right now. Hang up. You do not need a reason, an excuse, or to be polite about it. No genuine agency is harmed by you ending a call and phoning back on a number you found yourself. If the caller says you must not hang up, that settles it.

Then wait a minute before dialling — some operations hold the line open on older landlines so that your “callback” reaches them. Use a mobile, or a different phone, and look the number up on the agency’s official website or a letter you already have.

If money has gone.

  1. Call your bank’s fraud line today. A wire or transfer that has not settled can sometimes be recalled, and the first hours are decisive.
  2. For gift cards, call the issuer immediately with the card numbers and receipts. Occasionally a balance can still be frozen. Keep the physical cards.
  3. For cryptocurrency, send the transaction hashes to the receiving exchange.
  4. Report it. See where to report. Reporting is what produces the prosecutions on this page.
  5. Assume the details you gave are compromised. If you shared identity numbers, consider a fraud alert or protective registration — the country pages list the route.
  6. Expect another approach. Numbers that engaged once are called again, and a recovery offer often follows.

Preventing the next one. The most useful thing you can give an older relative is not a warning list but a procedural fact: no government agency will ever ask you to move money to keep it safe, or send someone to your door to collect it. That single sentence covers the whole category, requires no judgement about who is calling, and is easier to remember than any number of warning signs.

Where the money goes

The rails here are chosen for irreversibility, and they have shifted as banks got better at intervening.

Gift cards remain common for smaller sums, because the codes can be read down the phone and resold within minutes. Wire transfers to mule accounts handle mid-size amounts. Cryptocurrency, bought at an ATM or an exchange under instruction, handles the large ones.

The most striking adaptation is physical. Once bank transfers started triggering fraud-team calls, operations moved to couriers: the victim withdraws cash or buys gold — ordinary, legal transactions that no fraud system flags — and hands it to someone at the door. The FBI recorded roughly 725 gold courier complaints and $311.8 million in losses in 2025, more than $400,000 per complaint, and links them directly to victims of government impersonation and tech support scams.

The other half of this story

Our sibling site Clean on Paper explains how the collected money moves — the mule accounts, the gift-card resale market, and why converting proceeds into gold is such an effective intermediate step.

By the numbers

No agency publishes a line item for most of the schemes on this site, so these charts show the official categories that contain this scheme. Each series is labelled with the agency's own category name. See how the mapping works.

How contact was made, CA, 2025Horizontal bars of reported losses by contact channel in 2025, led by Direct call at $8.9m.How contact was made, CA, 2025Reported losses by the channel the scammer used, for the agency categories covering this scheme.Direct call$8.9mDirect call: $8.9mEmail$439,685Email: $439,685Other/unknown$296,137Other/unknown: $296,137Text message$244,967Text message: $244,967Internet-social network$227,024Internet-social network: $227,024Internet$191,304Internet: $191,304Not Available$93,484Not Available: $93,484Video Call$61,884Video Call: $61,884Door to door/in person$33,405Door to door/in person: $33,405Mail$12,008Mail: $12,008$0$2.5m$5.0m$7.5mAggregated across every agency category that maps to this scheme, so it inherits those categories’ breadth.Reported losses only. Every agency here says most fraud is never reported to it, so treat these as a floor, not a total.Sources: Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre / RCMP. Pulled 2026-09-06.
Full dataset, methodology and downloads
Reported losses over timeLine chart of reported losses from 2021 to 2025 for the agency categories that cover this scheme: Imposter Scams (US); Government Impersonation (US); Extortion (CA).Reported losses over timeEach line is one agency category that covers this scheme. Agency categories are usually broader than the scheme itself.$0$1.0bn$2.0bn$3.0bnImposter Scams (US), 2024: $3.0bnGovernment Impersonation (US), 2023: $394mGovernment Impersonation (US), 2024: $406mGovernment Impersonation (US), 2025: $798mExtortion (CA), 2021: $15mExtortion (CA), 2022: $15mExtortion (CA), 2023: $9.8mExtortion (CA), 2024: $15mExtortion (CA), 2025: $10m20212022202320242025Imposter Scams (US)Government Impersonation (US)Extortion (CA)Categories are the publishers’ own and are broader than this scheme, so these lines bound it rather than measure it exactly. Lines are notcomparable to each other: different countries, different reporting systems.Reported losses only. Every agency here says most fraud is never reported to it, so treat these as a floor, not a total.Sources: Federal Trade Commission (US); Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre / RCMP; FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). Pulled 2026-09-06.
Full dataset, methodology and downloads

Sources

Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see methodology for what that does and does not measure.

  1. 2025 Internet Crime Report. FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 32,424 complaints and $797,943,193 in 2025 losses; the 2023 and 2024 comparison; the payment-method split; gold courier figures.
  2. Justice Department Highlights Enforcement Efforts Protecting Older Americans from Transnational Fraud Schemes in Recognition of 2025 World Elder Abuse Awareness Day. US Department of Justice. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: The Delaware federal-agent impersonation plea, the Florida gold and cash indictment, and the Rhode Island pop-up case.
  3. Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. US Federal Trade Commission. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 265,975 Government Imposter reports in 2024, and the three-year trend from 197,496 in 2022.
  4. Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre Fraud Reporting System Dataset. Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre / RCMP. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: Canadian extortion-category volumes, which is where CRA-impersonation threat calls are filed.
  5. Targeting scams: report of the National Anti-Scam Centre on scams data and activity 2025. National Anti-Scam Centre (ACCC), Australia. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: Threat-based scams as the highest-loss type for Australians aged 18-24, and the finding that people from CALD communities made up 7% of threat-based reporters but 52.7% of losses.

Common questions

The caller ID showed the tax office's real number. Doesn't that prove it?

No. Caller ID is trivially spoofed, and scam operations routinely display the genuine published number of the agency they are imitating. The number on your screen is not evidence of who is calling. Hang up and dial the agency yourself from a number you looked up.

How do tax authorities actually contact people?

By letter, first, in every country covered on this site. They do not open with a phone call demanding immediate payment, they do not threaten arrest on a call, they do not ask for gift cards or cryptocurrency, and they do not send anyone to your home to collect money.

They knew my address and part of my ID number. How?

From data breaches, public records, and information sold between fraud operations. Knowing your details proves someone bought a list, not that they work for a government. Real agencies already have your details and do not need to recite them to you.

Would a government agency ever ask me to move money to a safe account?

Never, anywhere. There is no protective government account, no secure federal holding facility, and no circumstance in which an agency asks you to convert savings into gold or cryptocurrency for safekeeping. That request has no legitimate version.

I am on a visa and they threatened deportation. Is that possible?

Not by phone, and not by anyone demanding money. Immigration decisions arrive in writing through formal channels with appeal rights. Scam operations target visa holders and students precisely because the threat is more frightening — which is a reason to be more sceptical, not less.

I already paid. Can I get it back?

Sometimes, if you move immediately. Call your bank's fraud line today; a transfer that has not settled can occasionally be recalled. Gift card issuers can very occasionally freeze a card if you call fast with the numbers. Then report it — and refuse any later offer to recover the money for a fee.

Where government-impersonation money goesWhere government-impersonation money goes. The rails were chosen for irreversibility, and they moved as banks got better at intervening. Where government-impersonation money goesThe rails were chosen for irreversibility, and they moved as banks got better at intervening.The victim's cash andaccountsCards for small sums,wires for mid-size,crypto for the largestGift cards, wires,crypto — or cash andgoldOr handed over at thedoor: 725 gold couriercomplaints and $311.8min 2025A courier, or a muleaccountCodes resold andaccounts emptiedwithin minutesResale and onwardtransferReversibilityA recall is realistically possible only at the first hop, and only in the first hours. After the money is converted it becomes an investigation, not a refund.How the collected money moves — Clean on Paper, our sibling sitehttps://cleanonpaper.site/techniques/money-mules/Rails and figures from FBI IC3 reporting for 2025, which links gold courier complaints directly to government impersonation and tech support victims.howscamswork.com
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.

Report it

Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last few hours, call your bank first.