Also called: IRS scam · CRA scam · HMRC scam · ATO scam · Social Security scam · police impersonation · authority scam
Government impersonation is a scam in which a caller poses as a tax authority, police force, social security agency or border service and claims you owe money, are under investigation, or must move your funds to keep them safe. Reported US losses nearly doubled in a year, to $798 million in 2025. No agency demands payment by phone or collects cash from your home.
Key facts
Category
Impersonation
First documented
2013
Typical loss
$1k–$400k USD, per victim
Main channels
phone call, SMS, email, letter, WhatsApp, video call, robocall
Who is targeted
People over 60, who report the largest losses in this category; Recent immigrants and visa holders, whose status makes an official threat far more frightening; Non-native speakers approached in their first language; Anyone with an unresolved worry about tax, benefits or immigration; Students and temporary residents, targeted with deportation threats
Documented origins
India, United States, Dominican Republic, Pakistan, Nigeria
Main targets
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, India, Singapore, Ireland, New Zealand
Case files
23 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-09-06
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.
What it is
Government impersonation is the oldest lever in fraud pointed at the most reliable target: your
willingness to comply with authority.
Someone calls claiming to be from the tax office, the police, the social security administration, the
border service or a court. There is a problem — unpaid tax, a warrant, a compromised social security
number, a package intercepted at customs, an investigation with your name on it. It is serious, it is
happening now, and there is a way to resolve it that involves paying or moving money immediately.
What makes it work is not that people are credulous about government. It is that being contacted by a
government agency about a problem is a normal thing that genuinely happens, and most people do not
know the procedural details well enough to notice that this version is wrong.
The category is growing faster than almost anything else. IC3 recorded 32,424 complaints and $798
million in losses in 2025, against $405.6 million in 2024 — losses nearly doubling in a year. The
FTC logged 265,975 government imposter reports in 2024, up from 197,496 two years earlier.
How it actually works
The call, with the right number on the display
Caller ID shows the agency’s genuine published number, because spoofing it is trivial. Some
operations open with a robocall or a text and wait for the callback, which puts the victim in the
position of having initiated contact.
A specific, plausible problem
Unfiled tax. A warrant. A social security number used in a crime. A parcel with your name on it
stopped at the border. Details are sprinkled in — an address, part of an ID number — bought from
breach data, and offered as proof of legitimacy.
Your own details, quoted back at you
An address. Part of an identification number. An employer, a recent purchase, a family member’s
name. All of it is buyable from breach data and from lists sold between fraud operations, and all
of it is offered as proof that the caller is who they say. A real agency already holds your
details and has no reason to recite them to you.
The stakes are raised, then a door is opened
Arrest today, benefits stopped, deportation, assets frozen. Then, crucially, a way out: this can
be resolved now, quietly, if you cooperate. Fear alone makes people call someone else; fear plus
a solution makes them comply.
You are kept on the line
Do not hang up. Do not talk to anyone. Do not tell the bank — staff may be part of it. The call
can run for hours, and in the “digital arrest” variant it runs for days on video.
The instruction to move money
Pay the fine. Or, more damaging: move your savings to a “safe” or “protected” federal account
while the investigation runs. Or convert it to gold, or cryptocurrency, for safekeeping.
Where it could have stopped
No government agency anywhere asks you to move, withdraw or convert your money to keep it safe. There is no protective government account. That single instruction identifies the call as fraudulent no matter how convincing everything before it was — and it is the point at which losses go from hundreds to hundreds of thousands.
Collection on a rail with no reversal
Cryptocurrency at an ATM, gift card codes read aloud, a wire transfer, or gold and cash handed to
a courier at the victim’s door.
Repetition
Numbers that engaged once are worked again — sometimes by the same operation with a new pretext,
sometimes by a recovery scam weeks later.
Why it works
Compliance with authority is normally correct. People who pay their tax, answer letters and
cooperate with the police are behaving sensibly. The scam does not have to overcome scepticism; it
rides on a habit that serves people well the rest of the time.
Nobody knows the procedure. Most people could not say how their tax authority would actually
contact them about an underpayment, or what a real arrest warrant looks like. That gap is where the
whole scheme lives — and it is why the countermeasures on this page are procedural facts rather than
instructions to be sceptical.
The details feel like proof. An address, the last digits of an ID number, an employer’s name. All
of it is buyable. Real agencies already hold your information and have no reason to recite it.
Fear plus a way out produces compliance rather than escape. Pure intimidation makes people hang up
and call someone. Intimidation with an offered resolution keeps them on the line, cooperating, feeling
that they are handling it responsibly.
Isolation is imposed explicitly. Stay on the line. Do not discuss it. Bank staff may be involved.
The instruction is the scheme defending itself against the person most likely to stop it — a teller
asking what the withdrawal is for.
And vulnerability is targeted deliberately. Australia’s National Anti-Scam Centre found that
people from culturally and linguistically diverse communities made up 7% of those reporting
threat-based scams but 52.7% of the losses, driven substantially by operations impersonating
overseas law enforcement and threatening imprisonment or deportation. Threat-based scams were also the
highest-loss category for Australians aged 18 to 24 — young migrants and international students, not
the pensioners the stereotype expects.
Where it comes from
Two well-documented production centres appear repeatedly in the enforcement record, and both are
described here as criminal operations rather than as anything about the countries they sit in.
India-based call centres account for a large share of the North American volume. The Justice
Department has run repeated joint actions with Indian authorities, and the Delaware case documented
below involved an Indian national and at least $2.1 million in losses from victims told they were
under federal investigation. These are organised operations with scripts, shifts and supervisors.
Call centres in the Dominican Republic feature heavily in the family-emergency and bail variants
aimed at the United States, with couriers based in US cities to collect.
There is also a domestic layer everywhere — the couriers, the mule accounts, the gold buyers — and it
is where prosecutions usually start, because it is the only part of the operation standing inside the
jurisdiction.
The most significant recent change is technical. The FBI has warned about senior US officials being
impersonated in messaging campaigns, and AI voice cloning has made a convincing impersonation cheap.
The practical consequence is that “they sounded official” has stopped being evidence.
In July 2026 the FBI updated a warning first issued in April 2025 about an ongoing scheme in which criminals impersonate FBI personnel and the Internet Crime Complaint Center itself in order to re-victimise people who have already been scammed. The scheme uses AI-generated video, spoofed websites that harvest personal data, and fake FBI profiles on social media, and it is triggered precisely when a victim announces they intend to report the fraud.
In June 2026 a federal court in California halted an operation trading as National Amendment Assistance, which the FTC alleges falsely represented that its mortgage relief services were connected to the CARES Act's homeowner assistance programmes and took unlawful upfront fees. Some homeowners fell behind on their mortgages and faced foreclosure. The allegations are unproven.
USCIS maintains a standing catalogue of immigration scams — impersonators, fake websites, visa lottery fraud, job offers, "jumping the line" schemes — and pairs it with a short list of things the agency will never do. The most useful item is the payment rule: USCIS will never ask you to transfer money to an individual, and does not accept Western Union, MoneyGram, PayPal, Venmo or gift cards.
The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre files the safe-account scam under "Bank Investigator", and its open dataset shows two lines moving in opposite directions. Reports fell from 2,311 in 2021 to 1,771 in the first nine months of 2025, while reported losses rose from C$4.7 million to C$18.7 million over the same period. Fewer people are being caught, and each one is losing roughly four times as much.
In May 2025 a grand jury in the District of New Jersey indicted Jhonny Cepeda of New York with wire fraud conspiracy. Prosecutors allege he worked as a courier in a "grandparent" or "family-in-need-of-bail" scam run from call centres in the Dominican Republic, which deceived numerous elderly Americans into believing a loved one had been arrested and urgently needed cash for bail and legal fees.
FinCEN's notice of 4 August 2025 records 10,956 IC3 complaints involving crypto kiosks in 2024 with about $246.7 million lost — complaints up 99% in a year. It also records the machines growing from 4,128 to 37,342 in six years, a third of one state's operators failing to register, and scammers steering victims to specific kiosks to avoid the compliant ones.
The FTC's Impersonation Rule took effect in April 2024 and makes it illegal to falsely pose as a business or a government body, or to misrepresent an endorsement, with civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation. In its first-year review the FTC recorded $2.95 billion in impersonation losses in 2024 and warned that AI-generated deepfakes threaten to turbocharge the problem.
The FTC publishes a Medicare Open Enrollment warning every autumn, and the 30 September 2025 edition contains the single most useful sentence in the whole category: real Medicare cards are free and mailed automatically. Anybody who calls offering a new or updated one, and asks for a number to process it, has identified themselves.
The FTC reported in August 2025 that combined losses from older adults who lost more than $100,000 to impersonation scams rose eightfold, from $55 million in 2020 to $445 million in 2024. The payment instructions in those cases are physical: cash into Bitcoin ATMs, and stacks of cash or gold handed to couriers.
The FTC's standing guidance on utility impersonation contains the one fact that resolves the whole scheme: a real utility company does not demand immediate payment to prevent a same-day shut-off. Everything else in the call — the account number, the local caller ID, the truck supposedly on its way — is decoration around a deadline that does not exist.
The Justice Department's June 2025 health care fraud takedown charged 324 defendants over more than $14.6 billion in alleged fraud — the largest in its history. Two of its cases matter to consumers rather than to insurers: identity theft affecting more than a million Americans across all fifty states, and a $703 million scheme in which AI was allegedly used to fake beneficiaries' recorded consent. All of it is allegation.
Across three parliamentary answers between December 2024 and December 2025, the Indian government reported blocking Skype IDs, WhatsApp accounts, SIM cards and handsets used for digital arrest at a steadily rising rate — from 1,700 Skype IDs to 3,962, and 59,000 WhatsApp accounts to 83,668. In the same answers it repeats that no separate count of digital arrest cases exists.
A parliamentary answer of 2 December 2025 records cyber fraud losses reported in India rising from ₹2,290 crore in 2022 to ₹22,846 crore in 2024 — a tenfold increase in two years — while complaints on the national portal went from 10.29 lakh to 22.68 lakh. The reporting system was also expanding over the same period, which is part of the rise and cannot be separated from it.
2025US · CACharged — allegation, not conviction$5.0m
In May 2025 the US Attorney's Office for the District of Rhode Island indicted eight people over a transnational fraud and money laundering scheme aimed at elderly people in the United States and Canada. Pop-up messages on victims' computers made false claims that lured them into calling live agents, who then told them their financial assets were at risk or could be garnished. Investigators identified around 300 victims in at least 37 states with known losses exceeding million.
Japan's National Police Agency began counting ニセ警察詐欺 — police impersonation fraud — as a separate category in January 2025. By the end of November it accounted for 9,642 cases and ¥83.19 billion: 38.7% of all special fraud cases and 68.6% of all the money. Ninety-nine per cent of it started with a telephone call.
Japan's special fraud reached 13,213 cases and ¥59.73 billion in the first half of 2025, up 47.5% and 162.1%. Underneath the totals the delivery channel is moving: bank transfers now carry 62.2% of cases, cryptocurrency handovers rose 1,445.8%, and 79.1% of all approaches still start with a telephone call.
In May 2025 the US Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware announced that Rakeshkumar Patel, an Indian national, had pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy over an elder fraud scheme targeting Americans. Victims were called by fraudsters posing as federal agents who convinced them their identities had been stolen and that they were themselves under federal investigation. The scheme involved at least .1 million in losses.
Homeland Security Investigations runs a dedicated initiative against Chinese organised crime groups exploiting gift cards. Its account is the clearest available: three techniques — tampering cards on shelves, attacking accounts online, and laundering codes bought by scam victims — combining organised retail crime, victim-assisted fraud and trade-based money laundering.
In May 2025 a grand jury in the Northern District of Florida charged Atharva "Andy" Sathawane with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering over a scheme that defrauded elderly victims across the United States into handing over money and gold in response to fraudulent phone calls and messages. The FBI recorded roughly 725 complaints and .8 million in losses to gold-courier schemes in 2025 — an average loss per complaint of over ,000.
The FTC's September 2024 analysis found reported losses at Bitcoin ATMs rising nearly tenfold from 2020 to over $110 million in 2023, and topping $65 million in the first half of 2024 alone. The median loss was $10,000, people over 60 were three times as likely to lose money at one, and the losses come overwhelmingly from impersonation scams.
On 9 October 2024, with hurricanes making landfall, the FTC, the Justice Department and the CFPB issued a joint warning about disaster scams and price gouging. It names four categories — fake charities, government impersonators, bogus recovery businesses and price gouging — and its framing is unusual: the message is addressed to companies as much as to consumers.
US consumers reported losing $212 million on gift or reload cards across 41,120 reports in 2024 — the sixth-largest payment method by losses, well behind bank transfers at $2.09 billion. The gap is the point: gift cards are used for the scams that take hundreds, and they are the method most likely to go unreported entirely.
On 14 May 2024 India's Ministry of Home Affairs published an alert describing a scheme it calls "digital arrest": callers posing as police, CBI, the narcotics department, the RBI or the Enforcement Directorate, holding victims on video for as long as it takes. The detail that makes the alert unusual is the set — the government records fraudsters using studios modelled on police stations, in uniform.
An unexpected call, text or email claiming to be a government agency. First contact about a real problem is a letter, everywhere.
A threat of immediate arrest, deportation, or frozen assets delivered by phone. Real enforcement does not work by warning you on a call.
Payment demanded in gift cards, cryptocurrency, wire transfer or cash. No agency on earth accepts these.
An instruction to move money to a “safe”, “protected” or “federal” account. There is no such account.
An instruction to convert savings to gold or cryptocurrency for safekeeping.
Anyone coming to your home to collect cash, gold or documents. No agency does this.
Being told to stay on the line, not to hang up, or not to discuss it with anyone.
Being told bank staff may be involved in the investigation, or that you must not say what a withdrawal is for.
Recitation of your own details as proof. Breach data is cheap. Real agencies do not need to prove themselves to you.
A number in the message to call back on. Look the agency up yourself, every time.
A caller who transfers you to a “supervisor” or a second agency to add weight.
If it’s happening to you
On a call right now. Hang up. You do not need a reason, an excuse, or to be polite about it. No
genuine agency is harmed by you ending a call and phoning back on a number you found yourself. If the
caller says you must not hang up, that settles it.
Then wait a minute before dialling — some operations hold the line open on older landlines so that
your “callback” reaches them. Use a mobile, or a different phone, and look the number up on the
agency’s official website or a letter you already have.
If money has gone.
Call your bank’s fraud line today. A wire or transfer that has not settled can sometimes be
recalled, and the first hours are decisive.
For gift cards, call the issuer immediately with the card numbers and receipts. Occasionally a
balance can still be frozen. Keep the physical cards.
For cryptocurrency, send the transaction hashes to the receiving exchange.
Report it. See where to report. Reporting is what produces the
prosecutions on this page.
Assume the details you gave are compromised. If you shared identity numbers, consider a fraud
alert or protective registration — the country pages list the route.
Expect another approach. Numbers that engaged once are called again, and a
recovery offer often follows.
Preventing the next one. The most useful thing you can give an older relative is not a warning
list but a procedural fact: no government agency will ever ask you to move money to keep it safe, or
send someone to your door to collect it. That single sentence covers the whole category, requires no
judgement about who is calling, and is easier to remember than any number of warning signs.
Where the money goes
The rails here are chosen for irreversibility, and they have shifted as banks got better at
intervening.
Gift cards remain common for smaller sums, because the codes can be read down the phone and resold
within minutes. Wire transfers to mule accounts handle mid-size amounts. Cryptocurrency, bought at an
ATM or an exchange under instruction, handles the large ones.
The most striking adaptation is physical. Once bank transfers started triggering fraud-team calls,
operations moved to couriers: the victim withdraws cash or buys gold — ordinary, legal transactions
that no fraud system flags — and hands it to someone at the door. The FBI recorded roughly 725 gold
courier complaints and $311.8 million in losses in 2025, more than $400,000 per complaint, and links
them directly to victims of government impersonation and tech support scams.
The other half of this story
Our sibling site Clean on Paper explains how the collected money moves — the mule accounts, the gift-card resale market, and why converting proceeds into gold is such an effective intermediate step.
By the numbers
No agency publishes a line item for most of the schemes on this site, so these charts show the
official categories that contain this scheme. Each series is labelled with the agency's
own category name. See how the mapping works.
Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see
methodology for what that does and does not measure.
2025 Internet Crime Report.
FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 32,424 complaints and $797,943,193 in 2025 losses; the 2023 and 2024 comparison; the payment-method split; gold courier figures.
Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024.
US Federal Trade Commission. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 265,975 Government Imposter reports in 2024, and the three-year trend from 197,496 in 2022.
The caller ID showed the tax office's real number. Doesn't that prove it?
No. Caller ID is trivially spoofed, and scam operations routinely display the genuine published number of the agency they are imitating. The number on your screen is not evidence of who is calling. Hang up and dial the agency yourself from a number you looked up.
How do tax authorities actually contact people?
By letter, first, in every country covered on this site. They do not open with a phone call demanding immediate payment, they do not threaten arrest on a call, they do not ask for gift cards or cryptocurrency, and they do not send anyone to your home to collect money.
They knew my address and part of my ID number. How?
From data breaches, public records, and information sold between fraud operations. Knowing your details proves someone bought a list, not that they work for a government. Real agencies already have your details and do not need to recite them to you.
Would a government agency ever ask me to move money to a safe account?
Never, anywhere. There is no protective government account, no secure federal holding facility, and no circumstance in which an agency asks you to convert savings into gold or cryptocurrency for safekeeping. That request has no legitimate version.
I am on a visa and they threatened deportation. Is that possible?
Not by phone, and not by anyone demanding money. Immigration decisions arrive in writing through formal channels with appeal rights. Scam operations target visa holders and students precisely because the threat is more frightening — which is a reason to be more sceptical, not less.
I already paid. Can I get it back?
Sometimes, if you move immediately. Call your bank's fraud line today; a transfer that has not settled can occasionally be recalled. Gift card issuers can very occasionally freeze a card if you call fast with the numbers. Then report it — and refuse any later offer to recover the money for a fee.
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.
Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone
number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last
few hours, call your bank first.