Also called: extended warranty scam · vehicle service contract · car warranty robocall · Sumco Panama
An auto warranty robocall is a prerecorded call claiming your car's warranty is expiring, inviting you to press a key to speak to a "warranty specialist". It sells a third-party vehicle service contract deceptively marketed as a warranty. The FCC found one operation placed 5.19 billion calls in three months and proposed a record $299,997,000 fine.
What it is
We’ve been trying to reach you concerning your car’s extended warranty.
It is quoted in the FCC’s own enforcement release, and it is probably the most widely recognised
sentence in the history of telephone fraud. It has been a punchline for years.
It still generated more than eight billion calls from a single operation.
That is the fact worth starting with, because it dismantles the assumption underneath most scam advice.
This scheme does not work by being convincing. It works because a prerecorded call costs almost nothing,
so a response rate near zero is perfectly viable — and because the thing being sold is not really a
warranty at all.
What the robocall generates is a lead: a confirmed, live, engaged telephone number. What is
eventually sold, if the call goes all the way, is a third-party vehicle service contract,
deceptively marketed as your car’s warranty.
How it actually works
A number that looks local
Neighbour spoofing makes the caller ID appear to share your area code. One operation used
1,051,461 unique caller IDs in three months, which is why blocking numbers cannot keep up.
“Your car’s extended warranty”
A recorded voice says they have been trying to reach you, posing as a dealer, manufacturer or
insurer. The FCC notes that scammers may hold specific information about your car and warranty,
which is what makes the call hard to dismiss.
Press 1 to be connected
This is the entire purpose of the recording. Everything before it is a filter; the key press is the
product.
Where it could have stopped
Pressing any key confirms a working number attached to somebody who engages, which is exactly what is being harvested. So does speaking — including saying “remove me”. The only response that costs nothing is hanging up without saying anything.
Urgency about an expiry
Coverage is ending. Records show a final notice. Neither the record nor the deadline exists, and the
agent has no access to anything about your vehicle.
A contract, not a warranty
A vehicle service contract sold by a third party. The FCC’s finding is that these were deceptively
marketed as car warranties — which is the deception, because a manufacturer’s warranty comes with
the car and nobody telephones you about it.
Payment, then the exclusions
The terms that determine what is actually covered arrive after the card details do.
Your number is now worth more
A confirmed engaged line is resold as a lead, which is why answering one of these calls reliably
produces more of them.
Why it works
It costs nothing to fail. Eight billion calls at a fraction of a cent each. The economics do not
require persuasion — they require volume, and volume is free.
The premise is true for somebody. Millions of people genuinely are near the end of a manufacturer’s
warranty at any moment. The call does not have to be right; it has to be right occasionally.
Neighbour spoofing beats the obvious defence. A number sharing your area code and prefix gets
answered far more often than an unknown one — and it frequently belongs to a real person who has
nothing to do with it.
The product is real enough to survive scrutiny. Vehicle service contracts exist and are sold
legitimately. That makes the pitch far harder to dismiss than an invented product, and it means the
victim ends up with something — just not what they thought, and not at that price.
Blocking is arithmetic you cannot win. Over a million caller IDs in a quarter.
And answering makes it worse. The lead is the asset, so engagement is rewarded with more calls.
Where it comes from
Unusually for this site, one operation dominates the documented record — and the enforcement against it
is the most instructive thing on this page.
The scale. The FCC found the Cox/Jones enterprise placed approximately 5,187,677,000 calls to
550,138,650 wireless and residential phones between January and March 2021 — enough to have called
every person in the United States fifteen times in a quarter. Across the whole scheme, the FCC and its
partners believed upwards of eight billion robocalls had been generated since at least 2018.
The structure. Ten entities across three countries: Sumco Panama SA and Sumco Panama USA, Virtual
Telecom kft in Hungary, Virtual Telecom Inc., Davis Telecom Inc., Geist Telecom LLC, Fugle Telecom LLC,
Tech Direct LLC, Mobi Telecom LLC and Posting Express Inc. The dialling ran from Panama and Hungary.
The aggravation. The FCC escalated the penalty for egregious violations, and one reason stands out:
the operation called health care workers during a pandemic and spoofed hospital phone numbers, so
that people ringing back to complain tied up the lines of public safety institutions.
The prior ban that did nothing. Both principals were already prohibited from making telemarketing
calls under earlier FTC actions. The calls continued — which is a plain measure of what an
administrative prohibition is worth against an operation dialling from outside the country.
And the one thing that worked. In July 2022 the FCC issued its first-ever K4 Notice and N2 Order,
directing every US voice service provider to stop carrying the traffic. The volume of those calls fell
99%.
That is the fastest, most complete intervention documented anywhere on this site, and it worked because
it ignored both the callers and the victims. The operators were in Panama and Hungary and hard to reach.
The recipients were half a billion people. But the traffic had to cross a manageable number of licensed
US carriers — and carriers can be ordered to stop.
Real cases
2024 US Ongoing
US consumers filed 141,902 unwanted telemarketing complaints with the FTC in 2024, alongside 200,331 about unsolicited email and 164,634 about unsolicited texts. None of those figures measures the robocall problem, and the reason is instructive: one operation alone made five billion calls in a quarter that produced nothing like five billion complaints.
Read the case file ·
2 sources
2022 US · PA · HU Sanctioned
On 7 July 2022 the FCC ordered every US voice provider to stop carrying auto warranty robocall traffic from a single operation it believed had generated upwards of eight billion calls since 2018. The volume of such calls fell 99% within weeks — the clearest demonstration on this site that network-level intervention works when it is aimed at the carriers.
Read the case file ·
2 sources
2022 US · PA · HU Sanctioned $300.0m
In December 2022 the FCC proposed a $299,997,000 penalty — the largest in its history — against the auto warranty robocall operation, having found it placed approximately 5.19 billion calls to over 550 million phones in three months using more than a million spoofed caller IDs. Enough to have called every person in America fifteen times.
Read the case file ·
2 sources
Red flags
- A recorded voice about your car’s warranty. No manufacturer or dealer does this.
- “We’ve been trying to reach you.” Nobody has been trying to reach you.
- Press a key to be connected to a specialist.
- A local-looking number you do not recognise, calling repeatedly.
- Urgency about coverage expiring, or a “final notice”.
- The caller cannot tell you your car’s details until you supply them.
- Refusal to send terms in writing before payment.
- Pressure to pay today to lock in a price.
- A company name you cannot find, or one that changes between calls.
- More calls after you engaged with one, which is the system working as designed.
If it’s happening to you
On the call. Hang up without speaking. Do not press a key, do not say “remove me”, do not ask to be
taken off the list. Every one of those is engagement, and engagement is the product.
Do not answer unknown numbers if you can avoid it; let them go to voicemail. Turn on your carrier’s
call-blocking or labelling service, and use your phone’s silence-unknown-callers setting. None of this
stops the calls, but it removes you from the pool of people who answer.
If you are actually thinking about a service contract. That is a legitimate purchase, and it should
start with you. Call your dealership or manufacturer on a number you look up. Compare what your existing
warranty still covers. Read the exclusions before paying anything, and never buy one from a call you did
not make.
If you have already bought one.
- Get the contract in writing and read what is excluded. Many are technically valid products that
simply cover far less than the caller implied.
- Check for a cancellation window — most vehicle service contracts have one, often 30 days with a
full refund.
- Dispute the charge with your card issuer if the terms differ from what you were told. See
chargeback.
- Report it to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov, to the FCC at fcc.gov/complaints, and to your state
attorney general. See where to report.
- Expect more calls. Your number is now a proven lead.
Register with the Do Not Call list at donotcall.gov. It will not stop an operation dialling from
Panama, but calling a registered number is itself a violation, and it is part of what builds these
cases.
Where the money goes
This is the rarest structure on the site: a scheme whose primary product is not money taken from the
person called.
The robocall generates a lead. The lead — a confirmed, live, engaged phone number — is the asset, and it
is sold into a market of contract sellers. The eventual sale of a vehicle service contract happens
downstream, sometimes several hands away from whoever placed the call.
That is why the FCC describes it as a sales lead generation scheme rather than as a fraud on the
buyer, and why the enforcement is measured in calls placed rather than dollars taken. It is also why
there is no meaningful loss figure: the money that changes hands is a payment for a real, if oversold,
product.
The concealment sits where it always does — in the entity layer. Ten companies across the United States,
Panama and Hungary, so that dialling, billing and selling are separated, and no single company failing
ends the operation.
By the numbers
No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show.
The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are
invisible in official statistics.
Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see
methodology for what that does and does not measure.