NFT and crypto token rug pulls

Also called: rug pull · NFT rug pull · crypto exit scam · abandoned token project · liquidity pull

A rug pull is a cryptocurrency or NFT project whose creators collect investor money through a token sale or NFT mint, then abruptly drain the liquidity pool or wallet and disappear. Chainalysis counted $2.8 billion in rug pull losses in 2021 alone — 37% of all crypto scam revenue that year, up from just 1% in 2020.

Key facts

Category
Investment
First documented
2020
Typical loss
$100–$5k USD, per victim
Main channels
Discord, X (Twitter), NFT marketplaces, decentralized exchanges, Telegram
Who is targeted
Early buyers chasing a new NFT mint or token launch promoted on Discord and X; Retail crypto investors who commit to a project's roadmap and community hype before any product exists; Returning buyers of a creator's earlier, functioning project, recruited into their next launch on the strength of that track record; People new to crypto who cannot yet tell a genuinely locked liquidity pool from a marketing claim of one
Documented origins
United States, Vietnam
Main targets
United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Singapore
Case files
4 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-09-16
Anatomy of a rug pullAnatomy of a rug pull. Everything about the transaction is real. Only the team's follow-through is not. 1. The pitch: A website, roadmap and Discord or X following build around a game, staking rewards or community benefits that do not exist yet. 2. The mint or sale: Buyers send crypto into a smart contract or liquidity pool for NFTs or tokens. The transaction itself is completely real. 3. A team that was never verifiable: No independent code audit, a pseudonymous team, and a "locked liquidity" claim nobody outside the project can actually check. 4. The pull: Funds move from the project wallet or liquidity pool to the operators' own addresses — often within hours of the sale finishing. 5. Going dark: The Discord server, website and social accounts are deleted or abandoned, leaving buyers with no project and no one to answer questions. 6. Laundering the proceeds: Stolen crypto moves through mixing services and "chain-hopping" across multiple blockchains to break the trail. 7. The trail investigators actually follow: Blockchain analysts and federal investigators trace wallet activity through the mixing steps, then subpoena exchanges' identity records. 8. Wildly uneven outcomes, years later: Probation for one defendant, a jury conviction and prison exposure for a co-defendant, an unapprehended fugitive in a third case, and a civil settlement in a fourth. The diagram marks stage 3 as the point where the scheme can still be stopped: In the SEC's case against Eric Zhu, Game Coin publicly claimed its liquidity was locked while the engineer responsible for it secretly kept the control that made the claim true or false. A locking claim only means something if a buyer can verify it themselves on the blockchain.Anatomy of a rug pullEverything about the transaction is real. Only the team's follow-through is not.1The pitchA website, roadmap andDiscord or X followingbuild around a game,staking rewards orcommunity benefits that donot exist yet.Days to weeks2The mint or saleBuyers send crypto into asmart contract or liquiditypool for NFTs or tokens.The transaction itself iscompletely real.Minutes to hours3A team that was neververifiableNo independent code audit,a pseudonymous team, and a"locked liquidity" claimnobody outside the projectcan actually check.Ongoing4The pullFunds move from the projectwallet or liquidity pool tothe operators' ownaddresses — often withinhours of the salefinishing.Minutes to hours5Going darkThe Discord server, websiteand social accounts aredeleted or abandoned,leaving buyers with noproject and no one toanswer questions.Same day6Laundering theproceedsStolen crypto moves throughmixing services and"chain-hopping" acrossmultiple blockchains tobreak the trail.Hours to days7The trailinvestigatorsactually followBlockchain analysts andfederal investigators tracewallet activity through themixing steps, then subpoenaexchanges' identityrecords.Months to years8Wildly unevenoutcomes, years laterProbation for onedefendant, a juryconviction and prisonexposure for aco-defendant, anunapprehended fugitive in athird case, and a civilsettlement in a fourth.YearsWhere it can still be stopped — stage 3In the SEC's case against Eric Zhu, Game Coin publicly claimed its liquidity was locked while the engineer responsible for it secretly kept the control thatmade the claim true or false. A locking claim only means something if a buyer can verify it themselves on the blockchain.Stages drawn from four documented cases: the UndeadApes and Frosties NFT rug pulls (both US Justice Department prosecutions), the Baller Ape Club rug pull (charged, defendant not reported apprehended), and the SEC's civil settlement with Eric Zhu over the Game Coin token. Sources: ICE/HSI press releases, Decrypt, DL News and SEC Litigation Release No. 26223.howscamswork.com
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.

What it is

A rug pull is a cryptocurrency or NFT project that takes investors’ money once, through a token sale or an NFT mint, and never delivers anything after. The team builds a website, a roadmap and a following, collects payment through a real blockchain transaction, and then — sometimes within hours — drains the project’s wallet or liquidity pool and disappears. The purchase itself is completely real. Everything the project promised to do with the money is not.

The scale is not small. Chainalysis counted $2.8 billion in rug pull losses in 2021 alone, up from just 1% of crypto scam revenue the year before to 37% — a single year in which this mechanism went from a minor category to the dominant one in crypto fraud. The Justice Department has since prosecuted it as ordinary wire fraud and money laundering, in cases running from a $1.1 million Ethereum NFT collection to a $2.6 million rug pull whose operator has never been apprehended.

How it actually works

  1. The pitch

    A website, a roadmap and a Discord or X following build around promises of future value: a game, staking rewards, a broader community with ongoing benefits — none of which exist yet.

  2. The mint or sale

    Buyers send ETH, SOL or another cryptocurrency into a smart contract or liquidity pool in exchange for NFTs or tokens. The transaction itself executes exactly as advertised; only what happens to the money afterward is in question.

  3. A team that was never verifiable

    No independent code audit, a pseudonymous or unverifiable team, and a “locked liquidity” claim nobody outside the project can actually check.

    Where it could have stopped

    In the SEC’s case against Eric Zhu, Game Coin publicly claimed its liquidity was “locked” against insider withdrawal — while the engineer responsible for it secretly kept the control that made the claim true or false. A locking claim only means something if a buyer can verify it themselves on the blockchain; taking the team’s word for it is not verification.

  4. The pull

    Funds are transferred out of the project wallet or liquidity pool to the operators’ own addresses — often within hours of the sale finishing. Frosties’ 8,888-NFT mint and Baller Ape Club’s public sale were both drained on the same day they launched.

  5. Going dark

    The Discord server, website and social accounts are deleted or abandoned. Buyers are left holding NFTs or tokens with no project behind them and no one left to answer questions.

  6. Laundering the proceeds

    Stolen crypto moves through mixing services like Tornado Cash and “chain-hopping” — converting funds across multiple blockchains — to break the trail between the theft and any eventual cash-out.

  7. The trail investigators actually follow

    Blockchain analysis firms and federal investigators trace wallet activity across the mixing and chain-hopping steps, then use subpoenas to exchanges’ know-your-customer records to connect a pseudonymous wallet to a real identity.

  8. Wildly uneven outcomes, years later

    One defendant on this page received five years of probation after a guilty plea. A co-defendant was convicted by a jury and faced a federal prison sentence. Another, believed to be overseas, remains charged with no reported arrest years later. A fourth settled a civil case with the SEC without admitting wrongdoing. The same underlying scheme produced four different endings.

Why it works

Everything about the transaction is technically real. The blockchain record, the smart contract, the NFT or token landing in a buyer’s wallet — none of it is faked. Only the team’s follow-through is. That makes a rug pull far harder to spot in the moment than a scheme built on outright fabricated evidence.

Pseudonymity is normal, so it doesn’t read as a warning sign. Anonymous or pseudonymous founders are an accepted part of crypto culture, which means the one trait every rug pull operator on this page shared — nobody could verify who they really were before sending money — did not, by itself, stand out.

Hype compresses the time to decide. Discord raids, influencer promotion and a ticking mint clock are built to make buying feel urgent, leaving little time to check whether an audit actually happened or a liquidity lock is actually enforced on-chain.

The theft can happen faster than anyone can react. Frosties and Baller Ape Club were both drained within hours or a single day of their public sale. By the time buyers realized something was wrong, the money — and often the team — was already gone.

Crypto transactions do not reverse. There is no chargeback, no bank to call, no payment processor to dispute the charge with. Once funds leave a buyer’s wallet, getting them back depends entirely on identifying and prosecuting whoever took them.

Where it comes from

A mix of domestic and international operators, prosecuted under two different legal tracks.

Some of the documented operators are unremarkable Americans, not offshore criminal syndicates. The Frosties and UndeadApes cases on this page involve defendants in their early twenties, arrested in Los Angeles or living ordinary lives in Florida and Alabama — one an active-duty US Air Force member — rather than anyone operating from a scam compound.

Others are believed to be outside US jurisdiction entirely. The Baller Ape Club case names a defendant charged with a $2.6 million rug pull whose arrest, as far as the sources for this page show, has never been reported — the more common real-world ending for an international case, even once investigators can name a suspect.

Enforcement runs through both criminal and civil courts. The Justice Department has charged rug pull operators with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, carrying decades of potential prison time; the SEC has separately pursued rug pulls as securities fraud, seeking civil disgorgement and penalties rather than prison. Both tracks appear among this page’s cases.

The boom tracks the DeFi and NFT markets themselves. Chainalysis found rug pulls made up only 1% of crypto scam revenue in 2020, then 37% in 2021 — growth that tracks the same period NFT trading volume and new token launches exploded, not a change in the technique itself.

Real cases

The engineer hired to secure a token's liquidity rug-pulls it himself

2025 US Settled $553,000

Eric Zhu, a New York-based blockchain engineer hired to work on the "Game Coin" (GME) token, kept exclusive, undisclosed control of the liquidity provider tokens the project had publicly claimed were "locked" against insider withdrawal. He used that access to drain roughly $553,000 in crypto assets in January 2025, causing the token's price to fall by about 12%. The SEC charged him with securities fraud and settled for a disgorgement and civil penalty totalling nearly $823,000, which Zhu agreed to pay without admitting or denying the allegations.

Read the case file · 1 source

Baller Ape Club: a $2.6 million rug pull, and a defendant the US has not caught

2022 US · VN Charged — allegation, not conviction $2.6m

Le Anh Tuan, a 26-year-old Vietnamese national, and unnamed co-conspirators sold "Baller Ape Club" NFTs in October 2021, then deleted the project's website and disappeared with investors' money within a day of the public sale — at the time, the Justice Department called it the largest NFT scam it had charged to date. Tuan was indicted in the Central District of California on wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges in mid-2022. No source reviewed for this page reports his arrest.

Read the case file · 1 source

Frosties: $1.1 million gone within hours of the mint finishing

2022 US Convicted $1.1m

Ethan Nguyen and Andre Llacuna, both 20, created "Frosties," an 8,888-piece Ethereum NFT collection that promised buyers a themed video game and ongoing community rewards. Within hours of the mint selling out in January 2022, the pair transferred the roughly $1.1 million in proceeds to their own wallets and shut the project down. The Justice Department charged them the following March — one of its first criminal prosecutions of an NFT rug pull. In 2025, Llacuna testified he had since pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud, while giving evidence in the unrelated criminal trial of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm about how he and Nguyen used the mixing service to hide the money.

Read the case file · 2 sources

An active-duty airman and a co-developer rug pull $400,000 in Solana NFTs

2022 US Sentenced $400,000

Devin Alan Rhoden, an active-duty US Air Force member stationed at MacDill Air Force Base, and Berman Jerry Nowlin Jr. minted three Solana NFT collections — UndeadApes, Undead Lady Apes and Undead Tombstone — collecting nearly $400,000 before abandoning the projects and laundering the proceeds through Tornado Cash and cross-blockchain "chain-hopping." Rhoden pleaded guilty and was sentenced in November 2024 to five years of probation. Nowlin was found guilty by a federal jury the same year and faced sentencing on a maximum five-year prison term.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Red flags

  • Anonymous or pseudonymous founders with no verifiable real-world identity — not disqualifying on its own, but combined with the flags below, it is the pattern every case on this page shares.
  • No independent code or smart-contract audit, or an audit claim you cannot find published anywhere.
  • A “locked liquidity” claim you cannot verify yourself on a blockchain explorer — the SEC’s case against Eric Zhu shows exactly how a false version of this claim looks from the outside.
  • A roadmap promising a game, token utility or staking rewards with no working product yet.
  • Manufactured urgency — a countdown to mint, claims of an imminent sellout, or pressure to buy before missing “the next” price jump.
  • Aggressive Discord and X hype, giveaways, and “verified” partnership claims that cannot be confirmed independently.
  • A team that goes silent, deletes channels, or stops answering questions right after a sale completes — the point at which every documented case on this page turned.

If it’s happening to you

  1. Stop sending funds immediately if the project is still actively soliciting money.
  2. Check a blockchain explorer yourself for the project’s wallet or liquidity pool — you can often see directly whether it has already been emptied.
  3. Save everything before it disappears: screenshots, transaction hashes, wallet addresses, and the project’s own claims about audits or locked liquidity.
  4. Report it to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov, and to the SEC or CFTC if the project was marketed as an investment. See where to report for other countries.
  5. Report the project to the marketplace or platform it launched on, so the collection or token can be flagged for other buyers.
  6. Be wary of anyone who contacts you afterward offering to recover your funds for an upfront fee — that is a separate, documented scheme; see this site’s page on crypto recovery scams.

Where the money goes

Straight out of the project’s own wallet or liquidity pool, then through the same laundering steps in case after case: a mixing service, followed by movement across multiple blockchains, followed by conversion into ordinary currency.

Tornado Cash and chain-hopping appear in more than one case on this page. The UndeadApes operators used both — mixing the crypto, then converting it between Solana and Ethereum — before the proceeds became US dollars in a bank account. The goal in every documented case is the same: break the visible link between the wallet that took the money and whoever eventually spends it.

Recovery is rare and depends entirely on enforcement. Of the four cases on this page, only one — the SEC’s civil settlement with Eric Zhu — recovered any money at all, and only because Zhu agreed to pay disgorgement after being caught. The other three show money that, as far as these sources report, was never returned to investors.

The other half of this story

Our sibling site Clean on Paper explains how Tornado Cash and chain-hopping actually launder the proceeds — the exact technique documented in more than one case on this page.

By the numbers

No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show. The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are invisible in official statistics.

Sources

Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see methodology for what that does and does not measure.

  1. Jury Finds Non-Fungible Token Developer Guilty of Defrauding Investors and Laundering Proceeds Through Solana and Ethereum Blockchains. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Homeland Security Investigations. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The UndeadApes case facts, the Tornado Cash and chain-hopping laundering method, and the John Dumas quote.
  2. US Justice Dept. Charges Ethereum NFT Project Creators Over 'Rug Pull'. Decrypt. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The Frosties case facts, the same-day disappearance pattern, and the Damian Williams quote.
  3. HSI Baltimore-led investigation results in breakup of largest known NFT scheme to date. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Homeland Security Investigations. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The Baller Ape Club case facts, the international jurisdiction problem, and the chain-hopping laundering method.
  4. SEC v. Eric Zhu — Litigation Release No. 26223. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The Game Coin case facts, the locked-liquidity mechanism, and the civil settlement terms.
  5. Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High. Chainalysis. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The $2.8 billion 2021 rug pull figure, the growth from 1% to 37% of crypto scam revenue between 2020 and 2021, and the Thodex and AnubisDAO examples.
  6. Investor Alert: Watch Out for Fraudulent Digital Asset and "Crypto" Trading Websites. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Accessed 2026-09-16. Supports: The general digital-asset fraud red flags — unlicensed operators, guaranteed returns, unsolicited pitches and artificial urgency — that also apply to rug pulls.

Common questions

What's the difference between a rug pull and a Ponzi scheme?

A Ponzi scheme keeps paying early investors — using later investors' money — for as long as new money keeps arriving, which is what makes it look like a working investment for a while. A rug pull never gets that far: the creators take the mint or sale proceeds once, immediately, and disappear. There are no payouts to fake, because the money is gone before anyone is owed one.

Is every anonymous or pseudonymous crypto project a scam?

No. Pseudonymous founders are common in crypto culture and are not, on their own, proof of fraud. What the documented cases on this page share is anonymity combined with unverifiable claims — a "locked" liquidity pool nobody can actually check, an audit that was never completed, a roadmap with no working product. It's that combination, not the pseudonym alone, that shows up in every rug pull prosecuted so far.

A project told me its liquidity was locked. Doesn't that make it safe?

Not on its own. In the SEC's case against Eric Zhu, the Game Coin project publicly claimed its liquidity was locked while the engineer responsible for it secretly kept control of the tokens that made the claim true or false. A locking claim is only as good as your ability to verify it yourself on the blockchain — taking a team's word for it is not verification.

Can I get my money back after a rug pull?

Rarely, and only through the same enforcement action that eventually catches the operator — which, as this page's cases show, can take years and does not always happen. The SEC's settlement with Eric Zhu is one of the only cases here that returned money at all, and only because regulators identified and pursued him. Be especially wary of anyone who contacts you afterward offering to recover your funds for an upfront fee — that is its own scheme; see crypto-recovery-scam.

Why do so many rug pull operators never get caught?

Jurisdiction. The Baller Ape Club case on this page names a defendant, describes the charges against him, and — as far as the sources available for this page show — has not resulted in an arrest years later, because he is believed to be outside the United States. Chain-hopping and mixing services add a second layer of difficulty even when a suspect is identified: tracing the money and reaching the person behind it are two separate problems.

Where the money goesWhere the money goes. The same two laundering steps recur across separate documented cases: a mixer, then a hop across blockchains. Where the money goesThe same two laundering steps recur across separate documented cases: a mixer, then a hop across blockchains.The NFT or token buyerCrypto paid into themint or liquiditypool, believing itfunds the projectThe project's mint orliquidity poolProceeds moved througha mixing service and"chain-hopped" acrossblockchains, oftenwithin hours of thesaleA mixing service, thena hop acrossblockchainsConverted to ordinarycurrency or held ascrypto untilidentified byblockchain analysisThe operator's ownbank account or walletReversibilityA recall is realistically possible only at the first hop, and only in the first hours. After the money is converted it becomes an investigation, not a refund.How Tornado Cash and chain-hopping actually launder the proceeds — Clean on Paper, our sibling sitehttps://cleanonpaper.site/techniques/chain-hopping/Of the four documented cases on this scheme's page, only one — the SEC's civil settlement with Eric Zhu — recovered any money, and only after regulators identified and pursued him.howscamswork.com
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.

Report it

Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last few hours, call your bank first.