Also called: rug pull · NFT rug pull · crypto exit scam · abandoned token project · liquidity pull
A rug pull is a cryptocurrency or NFT project whose creators collect investor money through a token sale or NFT mint, then abruptly drain the liquidity pool or wallet and disappear. Chainalysis counted $2.8 billion in rug pull losses in 2021 alone — 37% of all crypto scam revenue that year, up from just 1% in 2020.
What it is
A rug pull is a cryptocurrency or NFT project that takes investors’ money once, through a token sale or
an NFT mint, and never delivers anything after. The team builds a website, a roadmap and a following,
collects payment through a real blockchain transaction, and then — sometimes within hours — drains the
project’s wallet or liquidity pool and disappears. The purchase itself is completely real. Everything the
project promised to do with the money is not.
The scale is not small. Chainalysis counted $2.8 billion in rug pull losses in 2021 alone, up
from just 1% of crypto scam revenue the year before to 37% — a single year in which this
mechanism went from a minor category to the dominant one in crypto fraud. The Justice Department has
since prosecuted it as ordinary wire fraud and money laundering, in cases running from a $1.1 million
Ethereum NFT collection to a $2.6 million rug pull whose operator has never been apprehended.
How it actually works
The pitch
A website, a roadmap and a Discord or X following build around promises of future value: a game, staking
rewards, a broader community with ongoing benefits — none of which exist yet.
The mint or sale
Buyers send ETH, SOL or another cryptocurrency into a smart contract or liquidity pool in exchange for
NFTs or tokens. The transaction itself executes exactly as advertised; only what happens to the money
afterward is in question.
A team that was never verifiable
No independent code audit, a pseudonymous or unverifiable team, and a “locked liquidity” claim nobody
outside the project can actually check.
Where it could have stopped
In the SEC’s case against Eric Zhu, Game Coin publicly claimed its liquidity was “locked” against insider withdrawal — while the engineer responsible for it secretly kept the control that made the claim true or false. A locking claim only means something if a buyer can verify it themselves on the blockchain; taking the team’s word for it is not verification.
The pull
Funds are transferred out of the project wallet or liquidity pool to the operators’ own addresses —
often within hours of the sale finishing. Frosties’ 8,888-NFT mint and Baller Ape Club’s public sale were
both drained on the same day they launched.
Going dark
The Discord server, website and social accounts are deleted or abandoned. Buyers are left holding NFTs
or tokens with no project behind them and no one left to answer questions.
Laundering the proceeds
Stolen crypto moves through mixing services like Tornado Cash and “chain-hopping” — converting funds
across multiple blockchains — to break the trail between the theft and any eventual cash-out.
The trail investigators actually follow
Blockchain analysis firms and federal investigators trace wallet activity across the mixing and
chain-hopping steps, then use subpoenas to exchanges’ know-your-customer records to connect a
pseudonymous wallet to a real identity.
Wildly uneven outcomes, years later
One defendant on this page received five years of probation after a guilty plea. A co-defendant was
convicted by a jury and faced a federal prison sentence. Another, believed to be overseas, remains
charged with no reported arrest years later. A fourth settled a civil case with the SEC without admitting
wrongdoing. The same underlying scheme produced four different endings.
Why it works
Everything about the transaction is technically real. The blockchain record, the smart contract, the
NFT or token landing in a buyer’s wallet — none of it is faked. Only the team’s follow-through is. That
makes a rug pull far harder to spot in the moment than a scheme built on outright fabricated evidence.
Pseudonymity is normal, so it doesn’t read as a warning sign. Anonymous or pseudonymous founders are
an accepted part of crypto culture, which means the one trait every rug pull operator on this page shared
— nobody could verify who they really were before sending money — did not, by itself, stand out.
Hype compresses the time to decide. Discord raids, influencer promotion and a ticking mint clock are
built to make buying feel urgent, leaving little time to check whether an audit actually happened or a
liquidity lock is actually enforced on-chain.
The theft can happen faster than anyone can react. Frosties and Baller Ape Club were both drained
within hours or a single day of their public sale. By the time buyers realized something was wrong, the
money — and often the team — was already gone.
Crypto transactions do not reverse. There is no chargeback, no bank to call, no payment processor to
dispute the charge with. Once funds leave a buyer’s wallet, getting them back depends entirely on
identifying and prosecuting whoever took them.
Where it comes from
A mix of domestic and international operators, prosecuted under two different legal tracks.
Some of the documented operators are unremarkable Americans, not offshore criminal syndicates. The
Frosties and UndeadApes cases on this page involve defendants in their early twenties, arrested in Los
Angeles or living ordinary lives in Florida and Alabama — one an active-duty US Air Force member — rather
than anyone operating from a scam compound.
Others are believed to be outside US jurisdiction entirely. The Baller Ape Club case names a
defendant charged with a $2.6 million rug pull whose arrest, as far as the sources for this page show,
has never been reported — the more common real-world ending for an international case, even once
investigators can name a suspect.
Enforcement runs through both criminal and civil courts. The Justice Department has charged rug pull
operators with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, carrying decades of potential prison
time; the SEC has separately pursued rug pulls as securities fraud, seeking civil disgorgement and
penalties rather than prison. Both tracks appear among this page’s cases.
The boom tracks the DeFi and NFT markets themselves. Chainalysis found rug pulls made up only 1% of
crypto scam revenue in 2020, then 37% in 2021 — growth that tracks the same period NFT trading volume and
new token launches exploded, not a change in the technique itself.
Real cases
2025 US Settled $553,000
Eric Zhu, a New York-based blockchain engineer hired to work on the "Game Coin" (GME) token, kept exclusive, undisclosed control of the liquidity provider tokens the project had publicly claimed were "locked" against insider withdrawal. He used that access to drain roughly $553,000 in crypto assets in January 2025, causing the token's price to fall by about 12%. The SEC charged him with securities fraud and settled for a disgorgement and civil penalty totalling nearly $823,000, which Zhu agreed to pay without admitting or denying the allegations.
Read the case file ·
1 source
2022 US · VN Charged — allegation, not conviction $2.6m
Le Anh Tuan, a 26-year-old Vietnamese national, and unnamed co-conspirators sold "Baller Ape Club" NFTs in October 2021, then deleted the project's website and disappeared with investors' money within a day of the public sale — at the time, the Justice Department called it the largest NFT scam it had charged to date. Tuan was indicted in the Central District of California on wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy charges in mid-2022. No source reviewed for this page reports his arrest.
Read the case file ·
1 source
2022 US Convicted $1.1m
Ethan Nguyen and Andre Llacuna, both 20, created "Frosties," an 8,888-piece Ethereum NFT collection that promised buyers a themed video game and ongoing community rewards. Within hours of the mint selling out in January 2022, the pair transferred the roughly $1.1 million in proceeds to their own wallets and shut the project down. The Justice Department charged them the following March — one of its first criminal prosecutions of an NFT rug pull. In 2025, Llacuna testified he had since pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud, while giving evidence in the unrelated criminal trial of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm about how he and Nguyen used the mixing service to hide the money.
Read the case file ·
2 sources
2022 US Sentenced $400,000
Devin Alan Rhoden, an active-duty US Air Force member stationed at MacDill Air Force Base, and Berman Jerry Nowlin Jr. minted three Solana NFT collections — UndeadApes, Undead Lady Apes and Undead Tombstone — collecting nearly $400,000 before abandoning the projects and laundering the proceeds through Tornado Cash and cross-blockchain "chain-hopping." Rhoden pleaded guilty and was sentenced in November 2024 to five years of probation. Nowlin was found guilty by a federal jury the same year and faced sentencing on a maximum five-year prison term.
Read the case file ·
3 sources
Red flags
- Anonymous or pseudonymous founders with no verifiable real-world identity — not disqualifying on its own, but combined with the flags below, it is the pattern every case on this page shares.
- No independent code or smart-contract audit, or an audit claim you cannot find published anywhere.
- A “locked liquidity” claim you cannot verify yourself on a blockchain explorer — the SEC’s case against Eric Zhu shows exactly how a false version of this claim looks from the outside.
- A roadmap promising a game, token utility or staking rewards with no working product yet.
- Manufactured urgency — a countdown to mint, claims of an imminent sellout, or pressure to buy before missing “the next” price jump.
- Aggressive Discord and X hype, giveaways, and “verified” partnership claims that cannot be confirmed independently.
- A team that goes silent, deletes channels, or stops answering questions right after a sale completes — the point at which every documented case on this page turned.
If it’s happening to you
- Stop sending funds immediately if the project is still actively soliciting money.
- Check a blockchain explorer yourself for the project’s wallet or liquidity pool — you can often see directly whether it has already been emptied.
- Save everything before it disappears: screenshots, transaction hashes, wallet addresses, and the project’s own claims about audits or locked liquidity.
- Report it to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center at ic3.gov, and to the SEC or CFTC if the project was marketed as an investment. See where to report for other countries.
- Report the project to the marketplace or platform it launched on, so the collection or token can be flagged for other buyers.
- Be wary of anyone who contacts you afterward offering to recover your funds for an upfront fee — that is a separate, documented scheme; see this site’s page on crypto recovery scams.
Where the money goes
Straight out of the project’s own wallet or liquidity pool, then through the same laundering steps in
case after case: a mixing service, followed by movement across multiple blockchains, followed by
conversion into ordinary currency.
Tornado Cash and chain-hopping appear in more than one case on this page. The UndeadApes operators
used both — mixing the crypto, then converting it between Solana and Ethereum — before the proceeds
became US dollars in a bank account. The goal in every documented case is the same: break the visible
link between the wallet that took the money and whoever eventually spends it.
Recovery is rare and depends entirely on enforcement. Of the four cases on this page, only one — the
SEC’s civil settlement with Eric Zhu — recovered any money at all, and only because Zhu agreed to pay
disgorgement after being caught. The other three show money that, as far as these sources report, was
never returned to investors.
By the numbers
No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show.
The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are
invisible in official statistics.
Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see
methodology for what that does and does not measure.