Also called: オレオレ詐欺 · it's me fraud · tokushu sagi · 特殊詐欺 · nise keisatsu sagi · ニセ警察詐欺
Ore-ore sagi is the Japanese scam that opens "it's me" — a caller posing as a relative in urgent trouble. It sits inside a national category, tokushu sagi or special fraud, which reached 24,912 cases and ¥121.3 billion through November 2025. Police impersonation now accounts for 68.6% of all those losses, and a third of ore-ore victims are under forty.
What it is
A phone rings. A young man’s voice says ore, ore — “it’s me, it’s me” — and waits.
The person answering supplies the name. Takeshi? Is that you? The caller now knows who he is
supposed to be, and has been told by the victim.
That is オレオレ詐欺, ore-ore sagi, and it has been Japan’s signature fraud for twenty years. It sits
inside a broader official category, 特殊詐欺 (tokushu sagi, “special fraud”) — the NPA’s term for
crimes that gain a victim’s trust remotely and take money without ever meeting them.
The category is the most carefully measured fraud statistic in the world. Japan publishes monthly
counts by scheme, by age band, by prefecture, by payment channel and by the tool used for the first
contact. Nothing else on this site comes close.
And what that measurement shows in 2025 is a scheme that has changed underneath its own name. Ore-ore
fraud nearly tripled in a year — and 73.3% of it is now someone claiming to be a police officer,
not a grandson.
How it actually works
The precursor call
A survey. A wrong number. Someone checking a bank detail. Nothing is asked for and nothing is
taken; a name, an address, a bank and an idea of what the household has are learned. Japanese
police logged 165,292 of these in six months.
“It’s me” — or “this is the police”
The classic opener is a relative in trouble, spoken so the victim supplies the name. The 2025
version is more often an officer calling about an investigation: 4,601 of 6,278 first-half ore-ore
cases were police impersonation.
A crisis with a deadline
A briefcase left on a train containing company money. A settlement that has to be paid today. An
account implicated in a money-laundering inquiry. Always today.
A second voice confirms it
A supervisor, a lawyer, a colleague, another officer. Corroboration arrives from inside the same
call, precisely when doubt does.
Where it could have stopped
Hang up and call back on a number you already have — your son’s, or the police station you look up yourself. Every version of this scheme fails at that step, which is exactly why the script works so hard to keep you on the line. The second voice exists to make hanging up feel unnecessary.
The channel is chosen for you
Increasingly a transfer you make yourself. Internet banking carries 38.6% of transfer cases and
59.5% of the money lost through transfers — a victim guided through their own banking app sends
much more than one sent to a counter.
Or somebody comes to the door
The 受け子 — a collector, usually young, recruited through a “dark part-time job” advert, who knows
nothing, is paid a fraction, and is the person who gets arrested.
Onward, increasingly in cryptocurrency
Direct crypto handovers rose 1,445.8% in a year. With transfers into exchange accounts,
cryptocurrency now carries 15.0% of all losses from 4.4% of cases.
Why it works
The victim names the caller. No other scam opens by having the target supply the identity being
impersonated. It removes the single most common failure point in impersonation fraud before the
conversation starts.
Obligation is cultural and specific. A family member’s failure is the family’s problem, and a son
who has lost his employer’s money is a situation with a clear correct response. The script is written
against that, not against gullibility.
Corroboration is manufactured inside the call. A second and third voice arrive on cue. The victim
never speaks to anyone who is not part of the operation, and never has a gap in which to.
Authority scales better than family did. A grandson pretext only works on grandparents. A police
officer works on anyone — which is exactly why ore-ore fraud’s fastest-growing victim groups are people
in their twenties and thirties.
The telephone still beats everything. 79.1% of all approaches, and rising. A voice adapts in real
time to whatever the person says, which no message can.
And it is reconnoitred first. 165,292 precursor calls in six months means the call that matters
often arrives already knowing who you are.
Where it comes from
Japan is the only country on this site that measures its own fraud problem well enough to describe its
shape precisely, so this section can be unusually specific.
It is domestic in target and increasingly foreign in origin. Phone numbers used from abroad in
special fraud reached 86,180 through November 2025, up 108.7% in a year. Japanese-language call
operations run from outside Japan have been a documented feature of this scheme for years, and the
international-number figure is the NPA’s own measure of it.
It is metropolitan, but the reconnaissance is not. The eight largest prefectures — Tokyo (2,165
first-half cases), Osaka, Kanagawa, Hyogo, Aichi, Saitama, Fukuoka, Chiba — carry 67.6% of cases
against 51.4% of the population. Precursor calls are more evenly spread, at 55.2%. The probing is
reaching regional Japan ahead of the losses.
The people who get caught are not the people running it. First-half arrests were 2,974 cases and
1,017 individuals against 13,213 cases — and the arrested are heavily the 受け子, the young collectors
recruited through “dark part-time job” adverts to pick up cash or cards. That recruitment is itself a
job scam, and it is why the physical delivery methods are
falling: a cash pickup costs the operation a person.
And the trajectory is up. 21,043 cases and ¥71.88 billion in the whole of 2024; 24,912 cases and
¥121.33 billion in the first eleven months of 2025. Cases up a third, losses up 109%.
Real cases
2025 JP Ongoing $556.0m
Japan's National Police Agency began counting ニセ警察詐欺 — police impersonation fraud — as a separate category in January 2025. By the end of November it accounted for 9,642 cases and ¥83.19 billion: 38.7% of all special fraud cases and 68.6% of all the money. Ninety-nine per cent of it started with a telephone call.
Read the case file ·
3 sources
2025 JP Ongoing $302.7m
Japanese ore-ore fraud nearly tripled in the first half of 2025 — 6,278 cases against 2,140 a year earlier — and the growth came almost entirely from young adults. Cases among people in their twenties rose 1,015.9% and among people in their thirties 918.6%. The share of all special-fraud victims who were elderly fell by 17.8 percentage points in a single year.
Read the case file ·
3 sources
2025 JP Ongoing $399.2m
Japan's special fraud reached 13,213 cases and ¥59.73 billion in the first half of 2025, up 47.5% and 162.1%. Underneath the totals the delivery channel is moving: bank transfers now carry 62.2% of cases, cryptocurrency handovers rose 1,445.8%, and 79.1% of all approaches still start with a telephone call.
Read the case file ·
3 sources
Red flags
- A caller who does not say their own name and waits for you to say it.
- “My number has changed” — the same pretext as the “Hi Mum” message, in a voice.
- A crisis that must be resolved today, usually involving somebody else’s money.
- A second person joining the call to confirm the story.
- Any claim to be a police officer asking about your accounts or assets.
- Instructions not to tell your family, or to keep the matter confidential.
- Being guided through your own banking app by someone on the phone.
- Anyone coming to your home to collect cash or a bank card. No institution does this.
- A request for your PIN, or for a card to be handed over “for safekeeping”.
- Any earlier call that asked about your assets, your bank or who lives with you.
If it’s happening to you
On the call. Say you will call back, and hang up. Then call the person on a number you already
have, or look up the police station or the bank yourself. Do not use any number given to you during
the call, including one offered as a verification line.
If you cannot reach the relative, call another family member. In every documented version of this
scheme, a single independent contact ends it.
Before it happens. The Japanese domestic advice is unglamorous and it works, because all of it buys
the same thing — a gap.
Leave the answering machine on and let unknown numbers go to it. Use a call-blocking device or a
carrier service that announces recording. Agree a family rule that no money moves on a phone call
without a callback on a stored number. Talk to older relatives about the scheme specifically, and to
younger ones too — under-forties are 30.3% of ore-ore victims now, and almost none of them think this
is aimed at them.
If money has moved.
- Call the bank immediately and ask for the transfer to be stopped and the beneficiary account
frozen. Speed is the only variable that matters.
- Call the police, or the consultation line #9110 if you are unsure. In Japan, the emergency
number is 110.
- Do not hand anything to anyone who arrives at your door afterwards, including someone offering
to help recover the money.
- Preserve the numbers that called you, times, and any transfer references.
- Report it — see where to report.
If someone came to the door. Note what you can safely note and tell the police. The collector is
usually a recruited young person who will be arrested, and who is a link to the operation rather than
the operation itself.
Where the money goes
Two routes, and one is replacing the other.
The physical route ends with the 受け子 — a collector recruited through an advert, sent to a doorstep
or a cash machine, paid a small share and arrested at a far higher rate than anyone else in the chain.
This route is shrinking: cash handover is down to 13.2% of cases and cash card handover or theft to
12.5%.
The remote route is winning. Bank transfers carry 62.2% of cases and 61.9% of losses, and within
them internet banking carries 59.5% of the money. Cryptocurrency — direct handovers plus transfers into
exchange accounts — has gone from negligible to 15.0% of all losses in a year.
The reason for the shift is straightforward economics. A cash pickup requires a person in Japan who can
be arrested. A transfer instruction requires nobody in the country at all, and the number of foreign
phone numbers used in these frauds doubled in the same period.
By the numbers
No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show.
The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are
invisible in official statistics.
Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see
methodology for what that does and does not measure.