A prize scam tells you that you have won a lottery, sweepstakes or inheritance, and that a fee must be paid before it can be released — tax, customs, insurance, legal costs. There is no prize, so there is no last fee. US reported losses nearly doubled to $194 million in 2025.
Key facts
Category
Other
First documented
1990
Typical loss
$500–$400k USD, per victim
Main channels
phone call, mail, email, SMS, social media, pop-up
Who is targeted
People over 70, who lose by far the most in this category; Anyone whose details appear on a purchased lead list of previous sweepstakes responders; People living alone, where a friendly regular caller fills a real gap; Previous victims of any scam, whose details are resold as a 'responder' list
Documented origins
Jamaica, United States, Nigeria, Ghana, Canada
Main targets
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand
Case files
9 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-09-06
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.
What it is
You have won. A lottery you do not remember entering, a sweepstakes you filled in years ago, a prize
draw at a shopping centre. The amount is large. The caller is delighted for you.
There is one administrative step. Tax has to be settled before the funds can be released. Or customs
duty on the prize. Or an insurance premium to cover the transfer. Or a legal fee, or a courier charge,
or a currency conversion cost. It is small against the winnings, and it is the last thing.
It is not the last thing. There is no prize, which means there is no point at which the sequence
naturally ends — and that is the structural feature that makes this scheme so much more damaging than
its reputation suggests. Enforcement records show individual victims losing hundreds of thousands of
dollars across months of fees.
Two national datasets show the same shift. US reported losses nearly doubled in 2025, from $102.2
million to $194.1 million. In Canada, reports fell by roughly three quarters between 2021 and 2025
while annual losses stayed flat around C$4.5 million — meaning loss per victim roughly tripled.
How it actually works
Your name is bought before anything happens
Lead lists of elderly consumers are a commercial product. US prosecutors have charged a broker
with selling a database of over seven million elderly Americans to lottery fraud operators, and
separately charged two business partners who sold lists to Jamaican clients for five years.
The notification
A letter, a phone call, an email, a pop-up. Sometimes a real lottery’s name and branding.
Frequently framed as a sweepstakes you entered — which many older people genuinely have, at some
point, at a fair or in a magazine.
The fee, framed as procedure
Tax. Customs. Insurance. A processing charge. It is never called a payment for the prize; it is
always an administrative requirement standing between you and money that is already yours.
Where it could have stopped
A legitimate prize never requires a payment of any kind. Tax on genuine winnings is settled with your own tax authority afterwards, through your normal return — never paid in advance to the promoter. This rule needs no judgement about who is calling and ends every version of this scheme.
An authority confirms it
A lawyer, a customs officer, a tax official, sometimes a named real agency. The second voice
exists to make the fee feel institutional rather than commercial.
The prize almost arrives
Delivery is scheduled. Then a new requirement appears — a bank charge, a certification, an
anti-money-laundering deposit — and the date moves. This repeats.
Sunk cost takes over
By the fourth or fifth fee, stopping means writing off everything already paid. The victim is no
longer chasing a prize; they are trying not to have wasted the money they have already spent.
Resale
Having paid once, the victim’s details become substantially more valuable and are sold on. This
is why prize-scam victims are so often hit repeatedly by unrelated operations.
Why it works
It is the most publicised scam in the world, which has quietly changed who it reaches. Everyone has
heard the joke. The people that publicity reaches now delete the letter. What remains is the
population publicity does not reach — and both the Canadian and US data show the same signature:
fewer victims, much larger losses each.
The fee is always small relative to the prize. Paying $800 to release $250,000 is not a
calculation most people would refuse if they believed the premise. The scheme spends all its effort on
the premise and none on the arithmetic.
Sunk cost has nothing to push against. In an investment scam there is at least a balance on a
screen that could, in principle, be checked. Here there is only a promise, and abandoning it means
accepting that every previous payment was wasted.
There is no natural end. A fake shop eventually has to deliver or not. A prize can be delayed
forever, and each delay comes with an apology and a new requirement.
The caller is often the nicest part of the victim’s week. In the enforcement record, prize
operations call repeatedly, chat, remember things. For someone isolated, that relationship is real
even when the prize is not — which is why simply telling someone to hang up rarely works.
And it hits an age group with assets and, often, no one checking. Seventy-plus victims are
over-represented in every dataset, and the FTC’s figures show median losses rising steadily with age.
Where it comes from
Jamaica has been a documented centre of lottery fraud aimed at the United States for two decades,
and the US Justice Department maintains dedicated enforcement work on it. The Arizona indictment
described below charges a Jamaican citizen over a scheme in which one victim lost more than $400,000.
West African operations run the inheritance and unexpected-money variants, structurally identical
and often blended with romance fraud — the case against the operator
known as “Dada Joe Remix” alleges a decade of exactly that combination.
The part of the supply chain that most deserves attention, though, is domestic. The lead-list
brokers charged in Florida in June 2025 were in the United States, selling US consumer data to
overseas operations. The callers are replaceable; the lists are the durable asset, and they are
manufactured and sold inside the countries being defrauded.
Sharon Dolisi, 79, of Phelps County, Missouri, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud after depositing more than $2 million from 28 lottery scam victims into her own bank accounts and supplying debit cards to co-conspirators in Jamaica, who withdrew the money. In June 2026 a federal judge sentenced her to three years of probation rather than prison, and ordered her to repay $1.97 million in restitution.
In June 2026 the FTC described several distinct pet-related scams running at once: fraudsters posing as veterinarians or law enforcement claiming to have your lost pet, counterfeit animal shelter websites soliciting donations, and prize scams targeting people who had previously donated to animal charities. Stolen or AI-generated images of animals appear across all of them.
A grand jury indictment unsealed in Arizona in May 2025 charged Joseph Kwadwo Badu Boateng, a Ghanaian citizen known as "Dada Joe Remix", with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Prosecutors allege that from at least 2013 through March 2023 he and co-conspirators ran a romance and inheritance scheme against elderly American victims and others worldwide, telling them gold and jewels were waiting to be released once taxes and fees were paid. Ghanaian authorities arrested him on 28 May 2025 at the request of the United States.
US reported losses to lottery, sweepstakes and inheritance fraud rose from $102.2 million in 2024 to $194.1 million in 2025, a 90% increase, on 5,623 complaints. Canada moved the other way on volume: prize-scam reports fell from 1,480 in 2021 to 339 in the first nine months of 2025, while annual losses stayed almost flat at around C$4.5 million. Fewer Canadians are being reached, and each one is losing far more.
2025US · JMCharged — allegation, not conviction$400,000
In May 2025 the US Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona announced an indictment charging Deeno Jackson, 27, a citizen of Jamaica, with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud over a lottery fraud scheme targeting elderly victims in Arizona and across the United States. One victim lost over $400,000.
2025US · JMCharged — allegation, not conviction$1.6m
In June 2025 the Justice Department's Consumer Protection Branch charged Troy Murray, also known as "Steve Dixson", with conspiracy to commit wire fraud for selling a lead-list database containing the names and personal information of over seven million elderly American consumers to lottery fraud scammers, including Jamaican operators. His son Cutter Murray agreed to plead guilty to one count of money laundering for receiving and laundering $1.6 million of the proceeds.
A federal jury convicted Phillip Priolo in March 2025 over a scheme that mailed millions of prize notices falsely telling recipients they had been specifically chosen for a large cash prize, which they would receive on payment of a fee. Thousands of victims, many of them elderly, over 21 months.
In April 2025 the owner of a Las Vegas printing and mailing business pleaded guilty to conspiracy over her part in producing millions of fraudulent prize notices between 2012 and 2018, in a scheme that took more than $15 million. She did not write the letters or take the money. She supervised the lasering, printing and mailing.
Patrice Runner ran a mass-mailing scheme from 1994 to November 2014, sending millions of letters that purported to be personal messages from the psychics Maria Duval and Patrick Guerin, offering wealth and happiness for a fee. Nearly identical letters went to tens of thousands of people a week. He was convicted in June 2023 on fourteen counts.
Any payment required before receiving a prize. Tax, customs, insurance, legal, courier, conversion. All of them. No exceptions.
You have won something you did not enter. You cannot win a lottery you did not buy a ticket for.
Payment in gift cards, wire transfer, cryptocurrency or cash. No promoter collects this way.
A request to keep the win confidential until it is claimed.
A deadline on claiming. Real prizes have generous claim periods and do not require same-day action.
A cheque arrives and you are asked to send part of it back. The cheque will bounce after your payment clears. See fake cheque scams.
An official confirms the win — a lawyer, customs officer or tax official you did not contact.
A foreign lottery. In most countries it is illegal to sell foreign lottery tickets across borders at all.
The fee changes, or another appears after you have paid one.
You are contacted again about a different prize after paying once. That is the resale.
If it’s happening to you
If you have not paid. Do not. There is nothing to verify and nothing to lose by ignoring it. If
you want certainty, look up the named lottery or company independently and call the number you found —
they will not have heard of it.
If you have paid.
Call your bank today. Recent transfers may be recallable; for gift cards, call the issuer with
the numbers immediately.
Stop all contact. There is no conversation that improves this, and continuing gives them more
to work with.
Report it. See where to report. Reporting is what produced the lead-list
prosecutions on this page.
Expect to be contacted again. Paying once moves you onto a more valuable list, and a
recovery approach frequently follows.
Tell someone. Prize-scam losses run for months precisely because nobody else knows.
If it is a relative. The instinct to say “this is obviously a scam” is understandable and usually
counterproductive — it makes the next payment a secret rather than a conversation. Better: ask to look
at the letter together, offer to call the lottery on a number you both look up, and anchor on the rule
rather than on their judgement. If money is leaving regularly, speak to their bank; many have
protections for exactly this pattern.
Where the money goes
Fees leave on rails chosen for finality: gift card codes read down the phone, wire transfers to mule
accounts, cash sent by post, and increasingly cryptocurrency. Because individual fees are small and
frequent, the money often moves through many small transfers rather than one large one — which is part
of why it evades the transfer-size thresholds that trigger bank intervention.
The other product in this market is data. The list is the asset that persists after the money is gone,
and the fact that a victim paid is itself valuable information that gets sold on. That is the
mechanism behind the single most reliable prediction in fraud: someone who has been defrauded once
will be approached again.
No agency publishes a line item for most of the schemes on this site, so these charts show the
official categories that contain this scheme. Each series is labelled with the agency's
own category name. See how the mapping works.
2025 Internet Crime Report.
FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: $194,147,851 in 2025 US losses across 5,623 complaints, and the 2023 and 2024 comparison.
Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre Fraud Reporting System Dataset.
Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre / RCMP. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: Canadian Prize-category and Foreign Money Offer reports, victims and losses, 2021 to 30 September 2025.
Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024.
US Federal Trade Commission. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 97,350 US prize, sweepstakes and lottery reports in 2024 with $351m in losses and a $1,000 median.
Do you ever have to pay tax before receiving a legitimate prize?
No. Where winnings are taxable, tax is settled with your own tax authority after you receive them, through your normal return. No legitimate promoter collects tax on a prize, and none requires a payment of any kind before release.
I never entered a lottery. How did they get my name?
From a lead list. US prosecutors have charged brokers with selling databases of elderly consumers to lottery fraud operations — one alleged list held over seven million names. Lists are compiled, maintained and resold as a commercial product, which is why entering a competition once can generate contact for years.
Why do people keep paying after several fees?
Because each payment increases the cost of stopping. The money already sent is framed as an investment in the prize, and abandoning it means losing everything paid so far towards something that does not exist. There is also no natural end point — a prize can be delayed indefinitely in a way a product cannot.
They said a lawyer and a customs official had verified it.
Those roles are played by the same operation or an accomplice. Verify independently: look up the named firm or agency yourself and call the number you found. In most cases the organisation exists and has never heard of the case.
A relative is paying fees for a prize and will not listen. What can I do?
Do not lead with 'you are being scammed' — that produces defensiveness and secrecy. Ask to see the paperwork together, offer to call the named lottery on a number you both look up, and focus on the single rule rather than their judgement: a real prize never requires a payment. If money is leaving regularly, talk to their bank, which may be able to apply protections.
Is the inheritance version the same scam?
Structurally, yes. A distant relative has died and left you money, and releasing it requires legal fees, taxes or a transfer charge. US prosecutors describe romance and inheritance schemes together for this reason — the pretext differs, the advance fee does not.
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.
Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone
number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last
few hours, call your bank first.