The FTC ranks "wrong number" texts among the five biggest text scams

2025 United States Ongoing

In April 2025 the FTC published its analysis of 2024 text-message fraud reports and placed the "wrong number" opener fifth among the top five text scams — the only one of the five with no pretext at all. The same analysis records $470 million lost to text-initiated fraud in 2024, more than five times the 2020 figure, and a doubling in the share of text scam reports that involved actual money lost.

Year
2025
Where
United States
Outcome
Ongoing
Reported loss
$470.0 million
Victims
Not stated in the sources
Schemes
Wrong number texts, Pig butchering, Phishing and smishing
Last reviewed
2026-09-06

The facts, as recorded

Why this case matters

Four of the FTC’s top five text scams arrive with a pretext. A package is held. A toll is unpaid. Your bank has spotted a purchase. There is a job going.

The fifth has no pretext at all. It is a message to the wrong person, and its entire content is that it was not meant for you.

That is what makes it worth a page of its own. Every defence people have learned about scam texts — do not click the link, check the sender, never enter your card details — is aimed at a message that wants something. This one wants nothing, on purpose, for as long as it takes.

What the data actually shows

The FTC published the analysis on 14 April 2025 and announced it on 16 April. Its headline is the $470 million lost to text-initiated fraud in 2024, more than five times the 2020 figure.

The number underneath is the more interesting one. In 2020, 5% of text scam reports involved money actually lost. In 2024, 11% did. The proportion of scam texts that succeed has roughly doubled.

Read alongside the Australian data — reports down 62%, losses up — the same picture appears in two countries. Filtering removes the cheap, generic messages. What survives is the patient kind.

The rank is not the harm

Wrong number sits fifth of five by report volume, and that ranking understates it badly.

Package and toll texts are reported in enormous numbers because everybody gets them and most people recognise them instantly. A report is generated by receiving the text, not by losing anything.

A wrong number message that works produces no report for weeks or months, because the person on the other end does not yet know they are in a scam — and when they do find out, what they report is an investment loss, which the FTC counts in a different category. The opener disappears into the outcome.

What the FTC says the sequence is

The regulator’s own description, across the spotlight and the 2024 consumer alert, is consistent: an innocuous message, an apology, a conversation that continues, a fake friendship often with romantic undertones, then claims of investing success, an offer to share the method, and a bogus platform.

The 2024 alert makes one further point that the statistics cannot. Replying at all — including to say they have the wrong number — confirms a working number attached to a person who answers strangers. Politeness is the data point.

Sources

  1. Top text scams of 2024. US Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Protection Data Spotlight. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: The ranking of the five text scams, the $470m total, the 11% loss-report share and the under-reporting caveat.
  2. New FTC Data Show Top Text Message Scams of 2024; Overall Losses to Text Scams Hit $470 Million. US Federal Trade Commission. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: The 16 April 2025 announcement, the $470m figure and the description of wrong number scams evolving into romantic conversation.
  3. Why it's not rude to ignore "hi, how are you?" text messages from strangers. US Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Advice. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: The 3 June 2024 alert, the apology-and-befriend sequence, the crypto pivot and the working-number confirmation.
  4. Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. US Federal Trade Commission. Accessed 2026-09-06. Supports: 246,784 fraud reports with text as the contact method and the $1,000 median loss.

If a legal outcome in this case has changed, please tell us and the page will be corrected. See the corrections policy.