Representative payee fraud

Also called: Social Security representative payee theft · rep payee fraud · stealing a beneficiary's Social Security · benefit fiduciary theft · misuse of benefits by a payee

Representative payee fraud is when a person or organization Social Security appoints to manage a beneficiary's payments uses the money for themselves. Payees range from parents to guardians to landlords. A Washington guardian took from 21 clients on 240 occasions; a Washington, D.C. rooming house operator took more than $400,000 and was sentenced to 32 months.

Key facts

Category
Other
First documented
2009
Typical loss
$18k–$524k USD, per victim
Main channels
Social Security's representative payee appointment process, guardianship and care businesses, rooming houses and supported housing run by the payee, parents and relatives who remain payee after a change in custody, false payee reports and forms
Who is targeted
Beneficiaries who cannot manage their own Social Security or SSI payments, including disabled children, elderly adults and adults with mental illness or disabilities; Children whose benefits continue to go to a parent after the child leaves that parent's custody; Tenants, clients and wards whose payee also controls their housing, bank accounts or care; The Social Security Administration, which pays the benefit and is the party that restitution is owed to
Documented origins
United States
Main targets
United States
Case files
3 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-10-20
Anatomy of representative payee fraudAnatomy of representative payee fraud. The payee is the only one who sees the money, so the beneficiary rarely knows it is gone. 1. The appointment: Social Security appoints a payee for a beneficiary who cannot manage payments, generally a family member or friend or, failing that, an organization. In one case the payee applied by telephone. 2. The duty: A payee must use the benefits solely on the beneficiary's behalf and keep records of how the money is spent or saved. 3. The diversion: The payee spends the money on themselves: their own bills, an account they control, checks to themselves or their company, and ATM withdrawals. 4. The unreported change: In two cases a child left the payee's custody and the payee never told Social Security, so the benefits kept coming. 5. The false paperwork: When Social Security asks, the answers are false: forms saying a child still lives with the payee, or a claim to have repaid a beneficiary who had not been repaid. 6. Targets who will not notice: In one case the guardian targeted clients with significant income or resources so the theft was less likely to be detected. 7. Discovery and sentence: SSA's Office of the Inspector General investigates with the US Attorney. The documented sentences range from five to 32 months, with restitution to Social Security. The diagram marks stage 2 as the point where the scheme can still be stopped: In one case the misuse surfaced when a supervisor went with the payee to Social Security to ask what had happened to a child's funds. Asking who the payee is, and how the money is spent, is the check.Anatomy of representative payee fraudThe payee is the only one who sees the money, so the beneficiary rarely knows it is gone.1The appointmentSocial Security appoints apayee for a beneficiary whocannot manage payments,generally a family memberor friend or, failing that,an organization. In onecase the payee applied bytelephone.Weeks2The dutyA payee must use thebenefits solely on thebeneficiary's behalf andkeep records of how themoney is spent or saved.Ongoing3The diversionThe payee spends the moneyon themselves: their ownbills, an account theycontrol, checks tothemselves or theircompany, and ATMwithdrawals.Months to years4The unreported changeIn two cases a child leftthe payee's custody and thepayee never told SocialSecurity, so the benefitskept coming.Years5The false paperworkWhen Social Security asks,the answers are false:forms saying a child stilllives with the payee, or aclaim to have repaid abeneficiary who had notbeen repaid.On request6Targets who will notnoticeIn one case the guardiantargeted clients withsignificant income orresources so the theft wasless likely to be detected.Ongoing7Discovery andsentenceSSA's Office of theInspector Generalinvestigates with the USAttorney. The documentedsentences range from fiveto 32 months, withrestitution to SocialSecurity.YearsWhere it can still be stopped: stage 2In one case the misuse surfaced when a supervisor went with the payee to Social Security to ask what had happened to a child's funds. Asking who the payee is,and how the money is spent, is the check.Stages drawn from three sentenced cases (2020 to 2026), two further SSA Inspector General releases (2025) and the Social Security Administration's Representative Payee page.howscamswork.com
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.

What it is

When a Social Security or SSI beneficiary cannot manage their own payments, the Social Security Administration can appoint a representative payee to receive and manage them. That person or organization is then the only one who sees the money. Representative payee fraud is when the payee uses it for themselves. The documented cases cover a rooming house operator, a professional guardian, a social worker, and parents who kept a child’s benefits after the child left their custody.

How it actually works

  1. The appointment

    Social Security appoints a payee for a beneficiary who is incapable of managing payments. It generally looks for family or friends and, failing that, a qualified organization. In the Washington tribal case, the payee applied by telephone.

  2. The duty

    A representative payee has a duty to use the benefits solely on behalf of the beneficiary, according to the Justice Department’s release in the Washington, D.C. case. Social Security says all payees must keep records of how the money is spent or saved.

    Where it could have stopped

    In the Washington tribal case, the misuse came to light when a supervisor went with the social worker to Social Security to ask what had happened to a child’s funds, and Social Security reported who the payee was. In the Massachusetts case, the mother had been told when she applied that she must notify Social Security if her child left her custody.

  3. The diversion

    The payee spends the money on themselves. In the documented cases the money went to the payee’s own bills, into an account the payee controlled, or out through checks to the payee, to the payee’s company or to cash, and ATM withdrawals.

  4. The unreported change

    Several cases turn on a change the payee did not report. In the Massachusetts case, a mother lost custody of her child in May 2016 and did not notify Social Security. In the New York case, the child was removed from the payee’s custody in September 2018 and she never reported it.

  5. The false paperwork

    When Social Security asked, payees in the documented cases gave false answers: in Massachusetts, two fraudulent forms in June 2022 claiming the child still lived with her and that she spent all the benefits on the child’s care, and in New York a lie that the child was still in her custody. In the Washington, D.C. case, the payee told agents she had paid a beneficiary back when she had not.

  6. Targets who will not notice

    In the Washington guardian case, the release says the guardian targeted clients with significant income or resources so that the theft was less likely to be detected.

  7. Discovery and sentence

    Social Security’s Office of the Inspector General investigates, usually with the US Attorney’s office. The sentences in the cases documented here range from five months to 32 months in prison, with restitution to the Social Security Administration, and in the tribal case a permanent bar on serving as a payee.

Why it works

The payee is the only one who sees the money. The payee receives the benefits on the beneficiary’s behalf, so the beneficiary, who by definition cannot manage payments, usually has no other view of them.

Some payees file no annual report. Social Security says it no longer requires parents or legal guardians of a minor who live with the child, parents of a disabled adult who live with them, and spouses to complete the annual report, though all payees must keep records.

The payee may be the person closest to the beneficiary. The documented cases include parents, a landlord, a professional guardian and a social worker.

Changes in circumstances need to be reported by the payee. In two of the cases here a child left the payee’s custody and the payee did not report it for years.

A professional position gives access. The guardian in the Washington case had access to clients’ bank accounts to pay rent and bills, and used it to write checks to himself.

Where it comes from

Entirely domestic: the Representative Payment Program is Social Security’s, so every documented case here is a US case.

Cases span the country. The documented cases are from Washington, D.C., Washington State, Massachusetts and New York, and the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General publishes similar releases from many states.

It can last for years. The rooming house scheme ran from at least March 2009 to February 2020. The Massachusetts mother received her child’s benefits for six years. The Washington guardian took from client accounts over about seven years, beginning in 2010.

Real cases

Tribal social worker sentenced for becoming payee for a disabled child in her care

2026 US Sentenced $17,638

Akeatha Diane Akintola, 48, formerly of Bellevue, Washington, a social worker for the Snoqualmie Tribe, pleaded guilty to theft of public funds and was ordered into custody on June 17, 2026 to serve five months in prison for stealing $17,638 in Social Security survivor benefits meant for a disabled minor who was a ward of the Tribe. The Tribe prohibits its social workers from becoming a representative payee for any child under its care. She applied by telephone in September 2023, had the benefits deposited into an account she controlled and spent them on herself. She failed to appear at the original May 22, 2026 hearing after leaving the United States. She is barred from becoming a representative payee for anyone in the future.

Read the case file · 1 source

Washington, D.C. rooming house operator sentenced for taking tenants' Social Security and VA benefits

2023 US Sentenced $523,696

Rosemary Ogbenna, 46, of the District of Columbia, was sentenced on February 28, 2023 to 32 months in prison for a scheme to steal more than $400,000 in Social Security and Veterans Affairs benefits intended for the care of elderly, mentally ill, disabled and veteran tenants of her rooming house business. Between at least March 19, 2009 and February 23, 2020 she became the representative payee of some tenants' Social Security benefits and used a portion for herself, and gained control of some tenants' monthly VA benefits and used a portion of those too. She pleaded guilty to mail fraud and false statements in June 2022 and was ordered to pay restitution of $523,696 and forfeit the same amount.

Read the case file · 1 source

Washington State guardian sentenced after taking from 21 clients over seven years

2020 US Sentenced $256,336

Wayne Jerome Houston, 61, of Port Ludlow, Washington, who owned and operated Cross Point Services LLC, a guardianship business for disabled and vulnerable adults, was sentenced on October 14, 2020 to one year and a day in prison and $256,336 in restitution for Social Security representative payee fraud. Over about seven years he took money from the accounts of 21 clients, using his access to write checks to himself, to his company or to cash, and to make ATM withdrawals, on 240 occasions. Social Security benefits were paid into accounts for at least 13 of the clients, for whom he was the representative payee.

Read the case file · 1 source

Red flags

  • A payee who controls the beneficiary’s housing, bank account and care, with no one else watching the money.
  • A beneficiary who goes without things the benefit should cover, such as rent, bills or personal items.
  • A payee who will not say how the money is spent, although all payees must keep records and show them if Social Security asks.
  • A child who has left a parent’s custody while the parent still receives the child’s benefits.
  • A professional, such as a social worker or guardian, who is also the payee for someone in their care.
  • Repeated small transfers, checks to the payee or cash withdrawals from a beneficiary’s account.

If it’s happening to you

If you think someone is misusing another person’s benefits:

  1. Find out who the payee is. In the Washington tribal case, a call to Social Security is what established it.
  2. Contact Social Security about your concern at 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778).
  3. Ask the payee how the money is being spent. All payees must keep records and make them available if Social Security asks.
  4. If a child has left your custody, tell Social Security. The Massachusetts mother was told when she applied that she must notify it, and she did not.
  5. Report suspected misuse. See where to report for agencies and for countries outside the United States.

Where the money goes

Entirely domestic, from the Social Security Administration into an account the payee controls, then out in small, repeated amounts.

The benefit is paid into an account the payee controls. In the documented cases it left that account in the payee’s own bills, ATM withdrawals, checks to the payee or the payee’s company, and a purchase at a retailer. Restitution is owed to the Social Security Administration: $523,696 in the Washington, D.C. case, $256,336 in the Washington guardian case, $86,994 in Massachusetts and $17,638 in the tribal case, plus forfeiture in the largest.

The other half of this story

Our sibling site Clean on Paper explains why small repeated withdrawals and transfers are hard for a bank to flag, the pattern the guardian case here describes across 240 occasions.

By the numbers

No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show. The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are invisible in official statistics.

Sources

Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see methodology for what that does and does not measure.

  1. Representative Payee. US Social Security Administration. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: What the Representative Payment Program is, who is appointed, advance designation, the annual Representative Payee Report and who is exempt from it, the record-keeping duty and educational visits and reviews, and the 1-800-772-1213 number.
  2. D.C. Woman Sentenced to 32 Months in Prison For Stealing Government Benefit Funds. Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: Rosemary Ogbenna's rooming house scheme from March 2009 to February 2020, her role as representative payee, the VA benefits, the more than $400,000, the false statement to agents, the June 2022 plea and the 32-month sentence with $523,696 restitution and forfeiture.
  3. Kitsap County guardian sentenced to one year in prison for stealing more than $250,000 from elderly and disabled clients. Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: Wayne Houston's guardianship business, the 21 clients, the 240 occasions, the 13 clients for whom he was payee, the targeting of clients with significant income and the one-year-and-a-day sentence with $256,336 restitution.
  4. Former Bellevue Social Worker Sentenced to Prison for Stealing Benefits from a Vulnerable Victim. Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: Akeatha Akintola's telephone application as payee for a tribal ward, the Tribe's prohibition, the account she controlled, the July 2024 visit to Social Security, the failure to appear, the June 2026 five-month sentence and the ban on future payee roles.
  5. Fall River Woman Sentenced for Stealing Nearly $90,000 in Social Security Benefits Intended for Her Child. Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: Nancy Taylor's embezzlement of about $86,994 from May 2016 through May 2022, the warning she received when she applied, the unreported loss of custody, the fraudulent forms in 2022 and the 10-month sentence.
  6. Binghamton Woman is Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison for Stealing a Child's Social Security Benefits. Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General. Accessed 2026-10-20. Supports: Loretta Washington's role as a child's payee, the unreported removal of the child from her custody in September 2018, her lie that the child was still in her custody, over $25,000 stolen between October 2018 and November 2021 and the 18-month sentence.

Common questions

What is a representative payee?

According to the Social Security Administration, its Representative Payment Program provides benefit payment management for beneficiaries who are incapable of managing their Social Security or Supplemental Security Income payments. Social Security appoints a suitable payee to manage the payments on the beneficiary's behalf. Generally it looks for family or friends, and when they cannot serve it looks for qualified organizations.

What must a payee do with the money?

The Justice Department's release in the Washington, D.C. case states that a representative payee has a duty to use Social Security benefits solely on behalf of the beneficiary. The Social Security Administration says all payees are responsible for keeping records of how the payments are spent or saved and for making them available for review if it asks.

Do all payees have to file a report?

No. The Social Security Administration says that, following a change in the law, it no longer requires some payees to complete the annual Representative Payee Report, including parents or legal guardians of a minor child who primarily live in the same household, parents of a disabled adult who live in the same household, and spouses. All payees must still keep records and make them available if asked. Social Security may also select any payee for an educational visit and payee review.

What if the beneficiary leaves the payee's custody?

The Massachusetts case on this page involved a mother who, according to the release, was told when she applied that she must notify Social Security if her child left her custody. She did not report losing custody, and the release says she kept receiving the child's benefits for six years. In the New York case on this page, a woman failed to report that her child had been removed from her custody and stole over $25,000.

How is this different from power of attorney abuse?

A power of attorney is a legal document the person signs, and the abuse is of that authority over their assets. A representative payee is appointed by the Social Security Administration and controls only Social Security or SSI payments. The two can overlap: the Washington guardian in this page's cases was both a court-appointed guardian and the payee for at least 13 clients.

What should I do if I think a payee is misusing someone's benefits?

Social Security's payee page lists 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778) for concerns about someone's benefits. In the Washington tribal case, the misuse came to light when a supervisor went with the payee to Social Security to ask what had happened to a child's funds. See <a href="/report/">where to report</a>.

Where the beneficiary's money actually goesWhere the beneficiary's money actually goes. The benefit goes to the payee's account and out again in small, repeated amounts. Where the beneficiary's money actually goesThe benefit goes to the payee's account and out again in small, repeated amounts.The Social SecurityAdministration, payingthe monthly benefitMonthly benefits aredeposited into anaccount the payeecontrols, intended forthe beneficiary's careAn account the payeecontrolsIn the guardian case,240 occasions ofchecks to the payee,to his company or tocash, and ATMwithdrawalsThe payeeSpent on the payee'sown bills andpurchases; restitutionof $523,696, $256,336,$86,994 and $17,638was ordered in fourcasesThe payee's own bills,cash, checks andpurchasesReversibilityA recall is realistically possible only at the first hop, and only in the first hours. After the money is converted it becomes an investigation, not a refund.Why small repeated withdrawals and transfers are hard for a bank to flag: Clean on Paper, our sibling sitehttps://cleanonpaper.com/techniques/structuring/Restitution figures are from the SSA Inspector General releases on the Washington, D.C. (2023), Washington State (2020), Massachusetts (2025) and Washington tribal (2026) cases.howscamswork.com
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.

Report it

Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last few hours, call your bank first.