Pension advance scams

Also called: pension advance · veteran pension buyout · pension poaching · disability payment buyout · structured cash flow purchase

A pension advance scam offers a veteran, retiree or pensioner a lump sum in exchange for years of future pension or disability payments, marketed as a "purchase" rather than a loan. Federal law makes military and VA pensions unassignable, so the contracts are void, yet CFPB cases found effective interest rates topping 28%, with fees hidden throughout.

Key facts

Category
Other
First documented
2011
Typical loss
$725k–$2700k USD, per victim
Main channels
online search ads, direct mail, telemarketing, attorney and broker referral networks
Who is targeted
Military veterans receiving VA disability compensation or Department of Defense military retired pay, payments federal law bars from ever being assigned to a third party; Civilian retirees living on a private or public pension who need a lump sum for a medical bill, debt or emergency repair; Anyone responding to a company with a patriotic-sounding name, a seal-like logo, or a claim of government affiliation; People with poor credit who cannot qualify for a conventional loan and search online for 'pension advance' or 'sell my pension'
Documented origins
United States
Main targets
United States
Case files
3 documented cases
Last reviewed
2026-09-27
Anatomy of a pension advance scamAnatomy of a pension advance scam. A 'purchase' of your future pension checks, on paper, an undisclosed high-interest loan in practice. 1. The pitch: A patriotic-sounding company or a seal-like logo advertises a lump sum today for a share of a veteran's or retiree's future pension or disability payment. 2. A 'purchase,' not a loan: The contract is written as a sale of the future payment stream, not a loan, specifically to skip interest-rate caps and Truth in Lending disclosure. 3. The lump sum: The consumer receives an immediate payment, a fraction of the total they will repay over a term the CFPB's Corbett/Gamber case describes as five to ten years. 4. The real cost, never disclosed: No interest rate appears in the paperwork. The CFPB calculated an effective rate exceeding 28% in its earliest documented pension-advance case. 5. Extra costs layered on: Some operators required a life insurance policy naming the company as beneficiary, an added undisclosed cost, per the CFPB's own consumer guidance. 6. Payments routed through an account they control: The consumer's monthly government deposit is directed into an account the company can access, so repayment is deducted automatically. 7. Enforcement, years later: Lawsuits arrive years into an operation's run, one documented network operated for nearly seven years before its complaint. Settlements produce a permanent ban and a fraction of redress, not a criminal conviction. The diagram marks stage 2 as the point where the scheme can still be stopped: VA disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay cannot legally be assigned to a third party under any circumstances. The CFPB's cases against Voyager Financial Group, Performance Arbitrage Company and Upstate Law Group all made the same point: the label does not change that these contracts were void the moment they were signed.Anatomy of a pension advance scamA 'purchase' of your future pension checks, on paper, an undisclosed high-interest loan in practice.1The pitchA patriotic-soundingcompany or a seal-like logoadvertises a lump sum todayfor a share of a veteran'sor retiree's future pensionor disability payment.Minutes2A 'purchase,' not aloanThe contract is written asa sale of the futurepayment stream, not a loan,specifically to skipinterest-rate caps andTruth in Lendingdisclosure.Same day3The lump sumThe consumer receives animmediate payment, afraction of the total theywill repay over a term theCFPB's Corbett/Gamber casedescribes as five to tenyears.Days4The real cost, neverdisclosedNo interest rate appears inthe paperwork. The CFPBcalculated an effectiverate exceeding 28% in itsearliest documentedpension-advance case.Ongoing5Extra costs layeredonSome operators required alife insurance policynaming the company asbeneficiary, an addedundisclosed cost, per theCFPB's own consumerguidance.Same day6Payments routedthrough an accountthey controlThe consumer's monthlygovernment deposit isdirected into an accountthe company can access, sorepayment is deductedautomatically.Monthly, for years7Enforcement, yearslaterLawsuits arrive years intoan operation's run, onedocumented network operatedfor nearly seven yearsbefore its complaint.Settlements produce apermanent ban and afraction of redress, not acriminal conviction.YearsWhere it can still be stopped: stage 2VA disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay cannot legally be assigned to a third party under any circumstances. The CFPB's casesagainst Voyager Financial Group, Performance Arbitrage Company and Upstate Law Group all made the same point: the label does not change that these contractswere void the moment they were signed.Stages drawn from the CFPB's cases against Andrew Gamber / Voyager Financial Group / BAIC / SoBell Corp and broker Mark Corbett (2019), Katharine Snyder / Performance Arbitrage Company / Life Funding Options (2019-2020), and Candy Kern-Fuller / Upstate Law Group (2020-2021), plus the CFPB's consumer guidance on pension advances. All three cases ended in stipulated settlements in which the defendants did not admit or deny the Bureau's specific allegations.howscamswork.com
The stages of the scheme, in order, with the point where it can still be stopped.

What it is

A company offers a lump sum of cash, a few thousand dollars, sometimes more, in exchange for years of someone’s future pension or disability payments. The paperwork calls this a “purchase” or a “sale” of those future payments, never a loan. That word choice is not a technicality: a loan comes with an interest-rate disclosure and, for military and VA pensions, an outright federal ban on ever being pledged as collateral in the first place. A “purchase” is dressed up to look like neither applies.

It does not work. Veterans’ disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay are unassignable under federal law, a court will not enforce a contract that hands a third party the right to collect them, no matter what both sides signed. The CFPB has brought four separate cases against different pension-advance networks since 2015, each alleging the same structure: a “sale” that was actually a high-interest loan, on payments the law says can never legally be sold.

How it actually works

  1. The pitch

    A company with a patriotic-sounding name or a seal-like logo advertises online, by mail or by phone, offering a lump sum today for a share of a veteran’s or retiree’s future monthly pension or disability payment.

  2. A “purchase,” not a loan

    The contract is written as a sale or assignment of the future payment stream, not a loan, specifically so it can skip interest-rate caps and Truth in Lending disclosures a real loan would require.

    Where it could have stopped

    VA disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay cannot legally be assigned to a third party under any circumstances. The CFPB’s cases against Voyager Financial Group, Performance Arbitrage Company and Upstate Law Group all made the identical point: calling the deal a “purchase” does not change that these contracts were void the moment they were signed.

  3. The lump sum

    The consumer receives an immediate payment, a fraction of the total they will hand back over a contract term the CFPB’s Corbett/Gamber case describes as running five to ten years.

  4. The real cost, never disclosed

    No interest rate appears anywhere in the paperwork. The CFPB calculated an effective rate exceeding 28% in its earliest documented pension-advance case, well above what a licensed consumer lender could charge, and never described to the pensioner as an interest rate at all.

  5. Extra costs layered on

    Some operators required consumers to buy a life insurance policy naming the company as beneficiary, an additional undisclosed cost on top of the inflated effective rate, according to the CFPB’s own consumer guidance on this product.

  6. Payments routed through an account they control

    The consumer is required to direct their monthly government deposit into an account the company can access, so repayment is deducted automatically every month without the consumer initiating a single payment themselves.

  7. Enforcement, years later

    Lawsuits arrive years into an operation’s run, one documented network operated for nearly seven years before its 2020 complaint. Settlements typically produce a permanent industry ban and a fraction of consumer redress, from $500 in nominal penalties to a $2.7 million judgment, rather than a criminal conviction.

Why it works

The need is real and immediate. Someone facing a medical bill, overdue rent or a bad debt is looking for cash now, not a lecture on assignability law, and a lump sum today answers that problem however the contract is labelled.

The legal mechanism is genuinely confusing. Selling an asset is ordinary and legal; selling the right to collect someone else’s future income is not, when that income is a federally protected pension or disability benefit. Most consumers have no reason to know the distinction exists.

The word “purchase” does real legal work, for the company, not the consumer. Calling the deal a sale rather than a loan is the entire reason it can dodge interest-rate caps and disclosure law, which is exactly why every CFPB complaint on this page challenges that label directly.

Patriotic branding builds trust with exactly the audience being targeted. A name, seal or slogan that reads as military-affiliated or government-endorsed works precisely because veterans are, by federal law, the one population these contracts can never legally bind, the marketing target and the legal protection point at the same people.

Automatic deduction removes the consumer from the transaction entirely. Once a government deposit is routed through an account the company controls, repayment happens without the consumer having to hand over money each month, which also means noticing the total cost, or that anything is wrong, takes far longer.

Where it comes from

Domestic, professionally run, and unusually likely to involve a licensed attorney or broker rather than an anonymous call centre.

These are registered US companies and, in one documented case, a practising lawyer. Voyager Financial Group, Performance Arbitrage Company and Upstate Law Group all operated in the open, with named owners. Candy Kern-Fuller, one of the individuals sued in 2020, is a South Carolina attorney whom the CFPB’s complaint alleges acted as banker, legal counsel and debt collector for the scheme for nearly seven years, a professional license lending credibility a call-center operator could not offer.

The same network of brokers recurs across separate corporate names. Mark Corbett, the broker permanently banned in the 2019 CFPB action, worked with Andrew Gamber’s Voyager Financial Group before regulators caught up with that entity, a pattern of moving between corporate vehicles that this site’s sibling project on money laundering documents as a common way to outlast a single company’s regulatory history.

Enforcement is civil, not criminal, in every documented case here. The CFPB and state attorneys general pursue these operations under the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s ban on deceptive acts, civil penalties, redress orders and lifetime industry bans, but no prison sentences, which is one reason the same “purchase, not a loan” structure kept reappearing under new company names from at least 2011 through 2020.

Settlements are often suspended based on documented inability to pay. The $2.7 million judgment against Gamber’s companies was suspended once he paid $275,000 combined, and Corbett’s own penalty was set at $1, both based on sworn financial statements, a recurring feature that means the nominal judgment amount and the money actually collected can differ enormously.

Real cases

A South Carolina attorney who banked, litigated for, and collected on a veteran pension-buyout scheme for seven years

2021 US Settled $725,000

The CFPB, the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs and the Arkansas Attorney General sued attorney Candy Kern-Fuller, Howard Sutter III and Upstate Law Group LLC in February 2020, alleging Kern-Fuller acted as banker, legal counsel and debt collector for a pension-buyout network that wired millions of dollars between veterans and investors for nearly seven years, and separately misrepresented that non-paying consumers could face criminal prosecution. A stipulated final judgment in January 2021 imposed $725,000 in consumer redress and a permanent ban from the business.

Read the case file · 2 sources

A South Carolina pension-buyout broker permanently banned from consumer finance

2020 US Settled

The CFPB and the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs sued Katharine Snyder and her companies, Performance Arbitrage Company Inc. and Life Funding Options Inc., in October 2019, alleging the same purchase-not-loan pension-buyout structure documented in related CFPB cases, targeting disabled veterans and other pensioners. A stipulated final judgment entered in November 2020, after Snyder filed personal bankruptcy, permanently barred her and her companies from ever again collecting on the affected contracts or offering any consumer financial product or service.

Read the case file · 2 sources

A veteran pension-buyout network settled for $2.7 million, its broker banned for a $1 fine

2019 US Settled $2.7m

In August 2019 the CFPB and the Arkansas Attorney General sued Andrew Gamber, his companies Voyager Financial Group LLC, BAIC Inc. and SoBell Corp., alleging they misled veterans and other consumers into "selling" their pension and disability payments through contracts that were actually high-interest loans, void under federal law. A separate CFPB action against the broker who arranged the underlying contracts, Mark Corbett, permanently banned him from the business for a $1 civil penalty tied to his documented inability to pay more.

Read the case file · 3 sources

Red flags

  • Any offer to “purchase” or “buy” your pension or disability payments rather than lend against them: VA and military retirement payments cannot legally be assigned at all.
  • No interest rate disclosed anywhere in the paperwork, even though you are repaying far more than you received.
  • A patriotic company name, seal-like logo, or any suggestion of government affiliation or endorsement.
  • A requirement to buy a life insurance policy naming the company as the beneficiary.
  • A request to redirect your government deposit into an account the company can access.
  • A repayment term measured in years, five to ten, in documented cases, for a lump sum that is a small fraction of the total you will repay.
  • Pressure to sign quickly, or discouragement from having an independent attorney review the contract.

If it’s happening to you

Stop any further payment or account access immediately if you have already signed, and do not sign anything more before getting independent advice.

  1. Know that the contract may already be legally void. VA disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay cannot be assigned to a third party under federal law, a court is unlikely to enforce an agreement claiming otherwise, whatever you signed.
  2. Revoke any automatic deposit redirection with the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, or your pension administrator, and route your payments back to an account only you control.
  3. Do not pay a “release” or “buyout” fee to exit the contract. Regulators have not documented a legitimate exit fee in any case on this page.
  4. Report it to the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov/complaint and the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov. See where to report for other countries.
  5. Check the CFPB’s consumer relief page at consumerfinance.gov/enforcement/payments-harmed-consumers/ periodically, redress from a case that settled years ago can still be distributed later, as it was in December 2023 for three of the networks documented on this page.
  6. Get a free benefits or financial counselling review through a Veterans Service Organization or a nonprofit credit counsellor before agreeing to any similar offer in the future.

Where the money goes

Stays domestic, moves through the broker’s own accounts and an investor pool, and is only partly recovered, years later, and only when regulators catch it.

There is no offshore laundering chain documented in any case on this page. The lump sum is typically funded by investors who are, in effect, buying the assigned payment stream from the broker; the broker collects a fee and passes the deducted monthly payments through to those investors for the life of the contract. When a state attorney general or the CFPB finally sues, the settlement recovers a fraction of what was collected, from a few hundred dollars in nominal penalties to a $2.7 million judgment across the three networks documented here, and that fraction can take years to reach consumers: the CFPB’s December 2023 distribution followed lawsuits filed as early as January 2019.

No federal or state complaint dataset currently breaks “pension advance” scams out as its own category, FTC Sentinel folds this pattern into its broader loan and lending categories, so this page’s “By the numbers” section does not show a dedicated dataset until one becomes available.

The other half of this story

Our sibling site Clean on Paper explains why the same pension-buyout scheme keeps reappearing under a new company name, the same pattern of moving between corporate vehicles documented in this scheme’s own cases.

By the numbers

No published dataset breaks this scheme out as its own category yet, so there is no chart to show. The data page explains which agency categories exist and why some schemes are invisible in official statistics.

Sources

Every factual claim above traces to one of these. Statistics are reported losses; see methodology for what that does and does not measure.

  1. Andrew Gamber, Voyager Financial Group, LLC, BAIC, Inc., SoBell Corp. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The August 2019 complaint, the $2.7 million redress judgment suspended to $200,000 plus a $75,000 Arkansas payment, the industry ban, and the misrepresentation allegations against Gamber's companies.
  2. Mark Corbett. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: Corbett's January 2019 administrative proceeding, the four CFPA violations alleged, his permanent industry ban, and the $1 civil penalty tied to his documented inability to pay.
  3. Katharine Snyder, Performance Arbitrage Company, Inc., and Life Funding Options, Inc.. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The October 2019 complaint, the November 2020 stipulated judgment, the permanent ban on collecting from affected consumers or offering any consumer financial product again, and the nominal civil penalties tied to Snyder's bankruptcy.
  4. Candy Kern-Fuller, Howard Sutter III, and Upstate Law Group LLC. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The February 2020 complaint, the January 2021 stipulated judgment, the $725,000 consumer-redress figure, the seven-year duration of Kern-Fuller's role as banker/counsel/debt collector, and the false-prosecution-threat allegation.
  5. CFPB to distribute nearly $6 million to consumers harmed by predatory loans to veterans. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The $6 million relief figure ($5,126,262 from the CFPB's victims relief fund plus $721,990 from defendants), the December 27, 2023 check-mailing date, and the link between the Corbett/Gamber, Snyder and Kern-Fuller cases as one enforcement sweep.
  6. I was offered a pension advance. What is this? What should I look out for?. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The definition of a pension advance, the explanation of why it functions as a loan, the mandatory-life-insurance and controlled-account red flags, the patriotic-branding tactic, and the statement that military pension advance products are illegal under federal law.
  7. CFPB and New York Department of Financial Services Sue Pension Advance Companies for Deceiving Consumers About Loan Costs. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Accessed 2026-09-27. Supports: The 2015 lawsuit against Pension Funding LLC, Pension Income LLC, Steven Covey, Edwin Lichtig and Rex Hofelter, the 2011-2014 operation period establishing how long this scheme pattern has been documented, and the effective interest rate exceeding 28%.

Common questions

Is it ever legal to sell your VA disability or military retirement payments for a lump sum?

No. Federal law makes VA disability compensation and Department of Defense military retired pay unassignable, a court will not enforce an assignment of those payments even if you signed one. Every CFPB case on this page turned on the same underlying point: the contracts these companies wrote were void from the moment they were signed, whatever the fine print called them.

The paperwork calls it a 'purchase,' not a loan. Does that matter?

Only to the company, not to you. The CFPB's cases found this labelling served one purpose: avoiding state interest-rate caps and federal Truth in Lending disclosures that would apply to an honest loan. In the earliest documented case, the CFPB calculated an effective rate exceeding 28% on a product marketed with no interest rate disclosed at all.

What is a 'pension advance' company actually offering?

A lump sum today in exchange for routing five to ten years of your monthly pension or disability check to the company, for total repayment far exceeding what was advanced. It functions as an extremely high-cost loan collateralised by an income stream the law says cannot be pledged in the first place.

Is a required life insurance policy part of the deal a red flag?

Yes. Federal regulators have documented pension-advance operators requiring borrowers to buy a life insurance policy naming the company as beneficiary, ostensibly to guarantee repayment if the pensioner dies before the term ends, an extra, undisclosed cost layered on top of an already-inflated effective rate.

The company that did this to me settled with regulators years ago. Can I still get money back?

Sometimes. The CFPB distributed nearly $6 million to consumers harmed by five networks of pension-advance brokers in December 2023, years after the underlying lawsuits were filed and settled. Redress from a case that settled long ago can still be distributed later, so it is worth checking the CFPB's consumer relief page periodically rather than assuming a resolved case means no payment is coming.

Where the lump sum and the repayment actually goWhere the lump sum and the repayment actually go. Real money changes hands up front, the harm is in the undisclosed rate and the years of deductions after. Where the lump sum and the repayment actually goReal money changes hands up front, the harm is in the undisclosed rate and the years of deductions after.A veteran or retiree,needing cash nowThe lump sum isfunded, a fraction ofthe total the consumerwill repay over fiveto ten years ofassigned pension ordisability checksThe pension-advancebroker, structuringthe deal as a'purchase'The broker assigns thesame payment stream tothe investors whofunded the deal,collecting a fee alongthe wayInvestors who fund thelump sum and collectthe assigned checksfor yearsYears later, if theCFPB or a stateattorney general sues,a fraction of what wascollected is orderedback as consumerredress: $500 innominal penalties to a$2.7 million judgmentacross three settlednetworksA fraction returned,years later, ifregulators catch itReversibilityA recall is realistically possible only at the first hop, and only in the first hours. After the money is converted it becomes an investigation, not a refund.Why the same pension-buyout scheme keeps reappearing under a new company name: Clean on Paper, our sibling sitehttps://cleanonpaper.com/techniques/shell-companies/There is no offshore movement in any of the cases documented here: the lump sum, the monthly deduction and the eventual judgment all stay inside the same US banking and court system the consumer was already using. The CFPB distributed nearly $6 million to consumers across these networks in December 2023, years after the underlying lawsuits were filed.howscamswork.com
Where the money goes after it leaves, and where it becomes hard to recover.

Report it

Reporting is what produces the enforcement data on this page. Find the right agency and phone number for your country on the report page. If money moved in the last few hours, call your bank first.